• DOI:10.1177/1460458212472333
• Corpus ID: 23306726

General practitioners’ attitudes towards decision-supported prescribing: An analysis of the Dutch primary care sector

@article{Meulendijk2013GeneralPA,
  title={General practitioners’ attitudes towards decision-supported prescribing: An analysis of the Dutch primary care sector},
  author={Michiel C. Meulendijk and Marco Ren{\'e} Spruit and Clara Drenth-van Maanen and Mattijs E. Numans and Sjaak Brinkkemper and Paul Jansen},
  journal={Health Informatics Journal},
  year={2013},
  volume={19},
  pages={247 - 263}
}

• M. Meulendijk, M. Spruit, +3 authors P. Jansen
• Published 19 November 2013
• Medicine
• Health Informatics Journal

The use of multiple drugs by patients increases the risk of medical problems. Clinical decision support could assist general practitioners with prescribing but is underused. This article aims to investigate the attitudes of general practitioners towards using decision support systems. A survey was distributed among 500 Dutch general practitioners. Virtually all 184 respondents indicated having a clinical information system, while only 21 percent indicated having a decision support plug-in; this correlated with their use of medical formularies. Only use of one of the medical formularies correlated with the number of recognized underprescription problems. General practitioners’ attitudes toward a newly proposed system aiding them with polypharmacy prescribing were mainly positive (57%); the perceived usefulness correlated with output quality (p = .000), time investment (p = .000), and financial stimuli (payability: p = .000 and reimbursement: p = .015) but not with job relevance. Dutch general practitioners are thus likely to adopt the proposed system under the conditions that it improves prescription quality and does not require extensive investments of time or money.