Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts

  title={Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts},
  author={David G. Wagner and Joseph Berger},
  journal={Sociological Perspectives},
  pages={1 - 32}
In this paper we argue for the utility of status characteristics theory (Berger et al. 1977) in accounting for research concerned with gender differences in interpersonal task situations. We state and defend a basic status argument that differences in stereotypical gender task behaviors are a direct function of status differences or of attempts to cope with status differences. We show support for this argument in several areas of research: the influence, participation and performer evaluations… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Status-based expectancies for aggression, with regard to gender differences in aggression in social psychological research
Meta-analyses of social psychological research have identified gender differences in aggression [Bettencourt and Miller, 1996; Eagly and Steffen, 1986], which have been understood to date in terms of
Status, Personality, and Gender Stereotyping: Response to Commentators
Status differences between women and men can explain why they perceive themselves as having different personality traits. The status explanation of gender stereotyping is discussed in relation to two
Status and the Gender Stereotyped Personality Traits: Toward an Integration
This paper integrates research findings on status and the gender stereotyped personality traits and examines the extent to which women’s lower status than men can account for two components of gender
Gender, Status, and Leadership
More than a trait of individuals, gender is an institutionalized system of social practices. The gender system is deeply entwined with social hierarchy and leadership because gender stereotypes
The Power of Language: Gender, Status, and Agency in Performance Evaluations
In the workplace, women often encounter gender stereotypes and biases that reinforce the existing gender hierarchy, may hinder women’s career aspirations and retention, and may limit their ability to
Social Rules for Managing Attempted Interpersonal Domination in the Workplace: Influence of Status and Gender
The present study utilized a social rules approach to investigate the relative influence of gender and status on managers' self-evaluations of their effectiveness in handling a dominating
Small-group Interaction and Gender
This field of study examines how people's social locations as men and women affect the patterns of behavior that organize their interaction in groups that are small enough to permit person-to-person
Reaching up: The influence of gender, status, and relationship type on men's and women's network preferences
Organizational research provides evidence that men and women differ in the structure of their personal networks as well as in the rewards attained from their personal networks (Ibarra 1992, 1993,
Gender, status and the use of power strategies
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University,Ramat Gan, IsraelAbstractThe present study examined the effects of gender and status on the use of power strategies. Theexperiment consisted of a
Gender status beliefs
Abstract The continued existence of gender-based inequality is puzzling in light of changes in formal and informal norms prescribing equality and in the presence of attitudes reflecting belief in


What Is the Relationship Between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups?
This paper analyzes the way task proceedings engender emotional reactions, the conditions under which these are expressed in positive and negative socioemotional behavior, and their effect on the
Can gender inequalities be reduced
Research demonstrates that sex or gender remains a powerful basis of inequality in the expectations and behavior of men and women in mixed-sex task groups. Drawing upon the work of Epstein (1970) and
Sex vs. status in sex-associated stereotypes
The trait content of sex stereotypes can be created by social role status alone, without reference to sex. In contemporary culture sex and role status are confounded: Authority roles are played by
Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence.
Findings support the idea that the gender differences obtained in interaction when status was not specified were partially a function of group members' belief that the sexes differ in competence.
Gender and Sex Role Differences in Group Decision‐Making Social Interactions: A Behavioral Analysis1
Sex role formulations assume relationships between role orientation and adjustive social behavior. However, few studies have examined behavioral differences with respect to both gender and sex role
Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation.
This paper presents evidence that members' perceived motivation towards the group is an important determinant of the influence and status they attain in task-oriented groups. Following Meeker and
Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups.
This paper proposes an expectation states theory of the legitimation of power and prestige orders in task groups. Valued status positions are a reward for those whose distribution members develop
Status and Participation in Six-Person Groups: A Test of Skvoretz's Comparative Status Model
A mathematical model of participation in n-person groups, derived from expectation states theory by Skvoretz (a), was tested in six-person task-oriented groups with systematically varying sex
Are Gender Differences Status Differences
Are gender differences in interaction a result of women’s lower status and power in society as a whole? A number of researchers have argued that they are (Berger, Rosenholtz, & Zelditch, 1980;
Situation and person‐centered approaches to promoting leadership behavior in low performance self‐esteem women
In each of 84 mixed-sex dyads, a low performance self-esteem woman was appointed to the role of leader in the dyad's decision-making task. Situation and person-centered approaches to promoting the