GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence.

@article{Brunetti2013GRADEG1,
  title={GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence.},
  author={Massimo Brunetti and Ian Shemilt and Silvia Pregno and Luke Vale and Andrew D. Oxman and Joanne Lord and Jane E. Sisk and Francis Ruiz and Suzanne Rose Hill and Gordon H. Guyatt and Roman Jaeschke and Mark Helfand and Robin T Harbour and M. Marina Davoli and L Santamaria Amato and Alessandro Liberati and Holger J. Sch{\"u}nemann},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2013},
  volume={66 2},
  pages={140-50}
}
OBJECTIVES In this article, we describe how to include considerations about resource utilization when making recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS We focus on challenges with rating the confidence in effect estimates (quality of evidence) and incorporating resource use into evidence profiles and Summary of Findings (SoF) tables. RESULTS GRADE recommends that important differences in… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
50 Citations
0 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 50 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…