Corpus ID: 216144451

G-DAUG: Generative Data Augmentation for Commonsense Reasoning

@inproceedings{Yang2020GDAUGGD,
  title={G-DAUG: Generative Data Augmentation for Commonsense Reasoning},
  author={Yiben Yang and Chaitanya Malaviya and Jared Fernandez and Swabha Swayamdipta and Ronan Le Bras and J. Wang and Chandra Bhagavatula and Yejin Choi and Doug Downey},
  booktitle={EMNLP},
  year={2020}
}
  • Yiben Yang, Chaitanya Malaviya, +6 authors Doug Downey
  • Published in EMNLP 2020
  • Computer Science
  • Recent advances in commonsense reasoning depend on large-scale human-annotated training data to achieve peak performance. However, manual curation of training examples is expensive and has been shown to introduce annotation artifacts that neural models can readily exploit and overfit on. We investigate G-DAUG, a novel generative data augmentation method that aims to achieve more accurate and robust learning in the low-resource setting. Our approach generates synthetic examples using pretrained… CONTINUE READING
    8 Citations
    SSMBA: Self-Supervised Manifold Based Data Augmentation for Improving Out-of-Domain Robustness
    • 1
    • PDF
    Beyond Language: Learning Commonsense from Images for Reasoning
    On Data Augmentation for Extreme Multi-label Classification
    Learning Knowledge Bases with Parameters for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems
    • 3
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 75 REFERENCES
    FreeLB: Enhanced Adversarial Training for Natural Language Understanding
    • 43
    • Highly Influential
    SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inference
    • 236
    • PDF
    CODAH: An Adversarially Authored Question-Answer Dataset for Common Sense
    • 13
    • PDF
    Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!
    • 16
    • PDF
    A Simple Method for Commonsense Reasoning
    • 117
    • PDF
    Generating Natural Adversarial Examples
    • 241
    • PDF
    HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?
    • 84
    • PDF
    Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biases
    • 24
    • PDF
    WINOGRANDE: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scale
    • 73
    • PDF
    Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examples
    • 214
    • PDF