Future impact: Predicting scientific success

@article{Acuna2012FutureIP,
  title={Future impact: Predicting scientific success},
  author={Daniel Ernesto Acuna and S. Allesina and Konrad Paul Kording},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2012},
  volume={489},
  pages={201-202}
}
Daniel E. Acuna, Stefano Allesina and Konrad P. Kording present a formula to estimate the future h-index of life scientists. 
Point/Counterpoint. The future h-index is an excellent way to predict scientists' future impact.
Articles you may be interested in Quantitative assessment of scientific quality AIP Conf.
The Gene of Scientific Success
TLDR
This article elaborates how to identify and evaluate causal factors to improve scientific impact and how this can be beneficial to various academic activities including teaching and research. Expand
Divinations of academic success may be flawed
Method for predicting future h-index comes under fire.
A measure of success
  • K. Jeang
  • Computer Science, Medicine
  • Cell & Bioscience
  • 2012
Cell and Bioscience is on track to receive its first Impact Factor in mid-2013. What is the role of the Impact Factor as a measure of a journal’s success?
On the Predictability of Future Impact in Science
TLDR
By applying a future impact model to 762 careers drawn from three disciplines: physics, biology, and mathematics, this work identifies a number of subtle, but critical, flaws in current models. Expand
On the Predictability of Future Impact in
Correctly assessing a scientist’s past research impact and potential for future impact is key in recruitment decisions and other evaluation processes. While a candidate’s future impact is the mainExpand
How relevant is the predictive power of the h-index? A case study of the time-dependent Hirsch index
TLDR
Results of an empirical study are reported showing that the increase of the h-index with time often depends for a long time on citations to rather old publications. Expand
Predicting authors’ citation counts and h-indices with a neural network
TLDR
A simple neural network is described and presented that predicts individual researchers’ future citation counts based on a variety of data from theResearchers’ past and finds a higher predictability than previous studies. Expand
A variant of the h‐index to measure recent performance
  • M. Schreiber
  • Computer Science, Physics
  • J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
  • 2015
TLDR
This work investigates a variant of the h‐index that considers only recent publications and is therefore more useful in academic hiring processes and for the allocation of research resources. Expand
Predicting scientific impact based on h-index
TLDR
Machine learning prediction technique, regression, is used to find the best set of parameters suitable for h-index prediction for the scientists from all career ages, without enforcing any constraint on their current h- index values with R2 as a metric to measure the accuracy. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-7 OF 7 REFERENCES
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
  • J. E. Hirsch
  • Physics, Computer Science
  • Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
  • 2005
I propose the index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number ≥h, as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher.
Does the h index have predictive power?
  • J. E. Hirsch
  • Mathematics, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2007
TLDR
The findings indicate that the h index is better than other indicators considered (total citation count, citations per paper, and total paper count) in predicting future scientific achievement. Expand
Measuring Nepotism through Shared Last Names: The Case of Italian Academia
TLDR
It is shown how disciplines with a high likelihood of nepotism can be detected using standard statistical techniques based on shared last names among professors, finding that for many disciplines the probability of name-sharing is boosted when professors work in the same institution or sub-discipline. Expand
h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
TLDR
This contribution presents a comprehensive review on the h-index and related indicators field, studying their main advantages, drawbacks and the main applications that can be found in the literature. Expand
Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards
TLDR
It is found that Asians are 4 percentage points and black or African-American applicants are 13 percentage points less likely to receive NIH investigator-initiated research funding compared with whites, after controlling for the applicant’s educational background, country of origin, training, previous research awards, publication record, and employer characteristics. Expand
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
TLDR
There is strong evidence of an association between significant results and publication; studies that report positive or significant results are more likely to be published and outcomes that are statistically significant have higher odds of being fully reported. Expand
Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net
Summary. We propose the elastic net, a new regularization and variable selection method. Real world data and a simulation study show that the elastic net often outperforms the lasso, while enjoying aExpand