Further reflections on the ontology of money: responses to Lapavitsas and Dodd

@article{Ingham2006FurtherRO,
  title={Further reflections on the ontology of money: responses to Lapavitsas and Dodd},
  author={G. Ingham},
  journal={Economy and Society},
  year={2006},
  volume={35},
  pages={259 - 278}
}
  • G. Ingham
  • Published 2006
  • Economics
  • Economy and Society
Abstract The debate on the nature of money, its origins and conditions of existence has been recently taken further in separate articles in Economy and Society by Lapavitsas and Dodd. Both criticize Ingham's elaboration of Keynes's contention that the money of account is the primary concept in a theory of money. Lapavitisas reiterates and extends his Marxist analysis of money's origins as a universal equivalent in commodity exchange. This fails to explain the existence of a money of account… Expand
Historicizing the money of account: a critique of the nominalist ontology of money
Money as an Institution
On Simmel's Pure Concept of Money: A Response to Ingham
  • N. Dodd
  • Sociology
  • European Journal of Sociology
  • 2007
The Significance of Money Beyond Ingham’s Sociology of Money
Money as a social relation beyond the state: a contribution to the institutionalist approach based on the Argentinian trueque.
  • Hadrien Saiag
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • The British journal of sociology
  • 2019
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 67 REFERENCES
Fundamentals of a theory of money: untangling Fine, Lapavitsas and Zelizer
The Role of the State and the Hierarchy of Money
Reinventing monies in Europe
Markets and money in social theory: what role for economics?
Concepts of Money
...
1
2
3
4
5
...