Further Evidence of the Affinity between the Dinosaurian Reptiles and Birds

@article{HuxleyFurtherEO,
  title={Further Evidence of the Affinity between the Dinosaurian Reptiles and Birds},
  author={Thomas Henry Huxley Huxley},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London},
  volume={26},
  pages={12 - 31}
}
  • T. Huxley
  • Geology
  • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London
On my way to Birmingham, in October 1867, I chanced to meet with Prof. Phillips; and mentioning some palæontological inquiries, chiefly relating to the Ichthyosauria (with which I then happened to be occupied), he very kindly urged me, as I returned to London, to pay a visit to the collection under his charge in the University Museum at Oxford. I did so; but as we were traversing the museum towards the Ichthyosaurian cases, we stopped at that containing the Megalosaurian remains, and I may say… Expand

Figures from this paper

Paper Mentions

WHY ORNITHOLOGISTS SHOULD CARE ABOUT THE THEROPOD ORIGIN OF BIRDS
TLDR
G. Heilmann (1926) concluded that birds had evolved from ‘‘thecodonts’’—a polyphyletic garbage bag assemblage of early archosaurs, and his hypothesis was the basis of many scenarios. Expand
A short history of research on Archaeopteryx and its relationship with dinosaurs
Abstract Archaeopteryx, first discovered in 1861 from the Solnhofen lithographic limestone of Bavaria, is the oldest feathered animal in the fossil record. Since its discovery it has been the focusExpand
Mosasaurs from Germany – a brief history of the first 100 years of research
Abstract In Germany, mosasaur remains are very rare and only incompletely known. However, the earliest records date back to the 1830s, when tooth crowns were found in the chalk of the Isle of Rügen.Expand
The ornithologist Alfred Russel Wallace and the controversy surrounding the dinosaurian origin of birds
TLDR
It is concluded that extant birds indeed descended, with some modifications, from small, Mesozoic theropod dinosaurs, and critically evaluate recent opposing views to this idea, including Ernst Mayr’s arguments against the “dinosaur-bird hypothesis”. Expand
PHYLOGENY OF NEORNITHES
TLDR
This work serves as a compendium of anatomical resources upon which a companion phylogenetic analysis of Aves and related Theropoda (Avialae) was based and summarized, to the extent feasible, previously published characters for which inclusion in the present work was judged to be unreliable or lacking sufficient clarity. Expand
La labor paleontológica de Thomas Huxley
If all life on Earth shares a common ancestor, with evolution gradually diversifying over time, then the fossil record should provide intermediate graduated forms. However, by 1859 (year of theExpand
The origin and early radiation of dinosaurs
Abstract Dinosaurs were remarkably successful during the Mesozoic and one subgroup, birds, remain an important component of modern ecosystems. Although the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs at theExpand
Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds
TLDR
Analysis of the five presently known skeletal specimens of Archaeopteryx confirm the conclusions (long rejected by most subsequent workers) of Heilmann (1926), Lowe (1935, 1944, 1944) and Holmgren (1955), namely, that the skeletal anatomy of Archaeipteryx is extraordinarily similar to that of contemporaneous and succeeding coelurosaurian dinosaurs. Expand
Dinosaur polyphyly and the classification of Archosaurs and birds
TLDR
A new classification of archosaurs and birds is presented, wherein the theropod ancestors of birds are transferred to the class Aves while all other dinosaurs are retained in the reptilian subclass Archosauria, which places full emphasis on the dinosaurian ancestry of birds but still manages to retain the stability of conventional classifications. Expand
The platypus is not a rodent: DNA hybridization, amniote phylogeny and the palimpsest theory.
  • J. Kirsch, G. Mayer
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences
  • 1998
TLDR
DNA-hybridization data on 21 amniotes and two anurans showing that discrimination is obtained among most of these at the class and lower levels is presented, concluding that the evidential meaning of the molecular data is as shown in the trees, but that the topologies may be influenced by a base-compositional bias producing a seemingly slow evolutionary rate in monotremes, or by algorithmic artefacts. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...