Further Evidence of the Affinity between the Dinosaurian Reptiles and Birds

  title={Further Evidence of the Affinity between the Dinosaurian Reptiles and Birds},
  author={Thomas Henry Huxley Huxley},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London},
  pages={12 - 31}
  • T. Huxley
  • Published 1 February 1870
  • Environmental Science
  • Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London
On my way to Birmingham, in October 1867, I chanced to meet with Prof. Phillips; and mentioning some palæontological inquiries, chiefly relating to the Ichthyosauria (with which I then happened to be occupied), he very kindly urged me, as I returned to London, to pay a visit to the collection under his charge in the University Museum at Oxford. I did so; but as we were traversing the museum towards the Ichthyosaurian cases, we stopped at that containing the Megalosaurian remains, and I may say… 

Figures from this paper


G. Heilmann (1926) concluded that birds had evolved from ‘‘thecodonts’’—a polyphyletic garbage bag assemblage of early archosaurs, and his hypothesis was the basis of many scenarios.

A short history of research on Archaeopteryx and its relationship with dinosaurs

Abstract Archaeopteryx, first discovered in 1861 from the Solnhofen lithographic limestone of Bavaria, is the oldest feathered animal in the fossil record. Since its discovery it has been the focus

Mosasaurs from Germany – a brief history of the first 100 years of research

Abstract In Germany, mosasaur remains are very rare and only incompletely known. However, the earliest records date back to the 1830s, when tooth crowns were found in the chalk of the Isle of Rügen.

The ornithologist Alfred Russel Wallace and the controversy surrounding the dinosaurian origin of birds

It is concluded that extant birds indeed descended, with some modifications, from small, Mesozoic theropod dinosaurs, and critically evaluate recent opposing views to this idea, including Ernst Mayr’s arguments against the “dinosaur-bird hypothesis”.


This work serves as a compendium of anatomical resources upon which a companion phylogenetic analysis of Aves and related Theropoda (Avialae) was based and summarized, to the extent feasible, previously published characters for which inclusion in the present work was judged to be unreliable or lacking sufficient clarity.

Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds

Analysis of the five presently known skeletal specimens of Archaeopteryx confirm the conclusions (long rejected by most subsequent workers) of Heilmann (1926), Lowe (1935, 1944, 1944) and Holmgren (1955), namely, that the skeletal anatomy of Archaeipteryx is extraordinarily similar to that of contemporaneous and succeeding coelurosaurian dinosaurs.

Dinosaur polyphyly and the classification of Archosaurs and birds

A new classification of archosaurs and birds is presented, wherein the theropod ancestors of birds are transferred to the class Aves while all other dinosaurs are retained in the reptilian subclass Archosauria, which places full emphasis on the dinosaurian ancestry of birds but still manages to retain the stability of conventional classifications.

Evolutionary relationships of ratites and carinates: evidence from ontogeny of the tarsus

  • C. Mcgowan
  • Biology, Environmental Science
  • 1984
The present ontogenetic study reveals both processes in birds: the ascending process exemplified by ratites and the pretibial bone by carinates, which implies that, since carinates possess the unique pretibIAL bone, they could not have given rise to the ratites, which are primitive for this feature.


It is proposed that the generic name Cetiosaurus be retained, with C. oxoniensis as the new type species, because the two forms do not share any autapomorphies.

Thomas Henry Huxley and the reptile to bird transition

Thomas Henry Huxley's views on the evolution of birds were much more complex than many modern authors appreciate.