Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments

@article{Eemeren1996FundamentalsOA,
  title={Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments},
  author={F. V. Eemeren and R. Grootendorst and A. F. S. Henkemans and J. A. Blair and Ralph H. Johnson and E. Krabbe and C. Plantin and D. Walton and C. Willard and J. Woods and D. Zarefsky},
  journal={College Composition and Communication},
  year={1996},
  volume={48},
  pages={437}
}
Contents: Preface. Introduction. Part I: Historical Backgrounds. Analytic, Dialectic and Rhetoric. Analysis of Fallacies, Controversy, and Discussion. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric. Toulmin's Model of Argumentation. Part II: Contemporary Developments. Informal Logic and Critical Thinking. Communication and Rhetoric. Fallacies and Formal Logic. Dialogue Logic and Formal Dialectics. Pragma-Dialectics and Critical Discussion. Language-Oriented Approaches to Argumentation. Other… Expand
A world of difference: The Ritch state of Argumentation Theory
This paper surveys the contributions to the study of argumentation in the two decades since the work of Toulmin and Perelman. Developments include Radical Argumentativism (Anscombre and Ducot),Expand
Karl Popper and Contemporary Argumentation Theory: the Case of Pragma-Dialectics
Virtually for the first time in the known historiography on the present impact of Karl Popper’s philosophy upon the theory of rhetoric and argumentation, this impact is scrupulously analysed and itsExpand
The Development of the Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation
This paper describes the development of pragma-dialectics as a theory of argumentative discourse. First the development of the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is explained, with theExpand
Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework
The paper reacts against the strict separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentation and argues that argumentative discourse can be analyzed and evaluated more adequately ifExpand
The Pragma-Dialectical Aim of Argumentation and Argumentative Discourse : Elimination of a Difference of Opinion
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualistic view of the function of argumentation and by its philosophical underpinnings. It is suggestedExpand
The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion
During the past thirty years the pragma-dialectical theorizing has developed in various steps from designing an abstract ideal model for critical discussion to examining strategic manoeuvring in theExpand
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics
  • F. V. Eemeren
  • Sociology, Computer Science
  • Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse
  • 2015
According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. HeExpand
'You’re Being Unreasonable’: Prior and Passing Theories of Critical Discussion
A key and continuing concern within the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation is how to account for effective persuasion disciplined by dialectical rationality. Currently, van Eemeren andExpand
On the divorce between philosophy and argumentation theory
The author compares the views of analytic philosophy regarding argumentation and its philosophical relevance, with those of contemporary argumentation theories, in general, regarding theExpand
The practice of arguing and the arguments: Examples from mathematics
TLDR
Mathematics is considered to illustrate some differences between argumentative practice and the products of it, to emphasize the need to address the different types of argumentative discourse and argumentative situation. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 870 REFERENCES
Perelman’s New Rhetoric as Philosophy and Methodology for the Next Century
Preface. I. New Thinking. II. The Origins and Foundation of the New Rhetoric. III. The New Rhetoric and Dialectics. IV. The Rhetorical Concept of Power and Authority. V. The Course of Argumentation.Expand
Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective
Contents: Part I:Argumentation and Communication. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Standpoints and Differences of Opinion. Argumentation as a Complex Speech Act. Speech Acts in a Critical Discussion.Expand
The Dialectic of Second-Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies
Arguments about fallacies generally attempt to distinguish real from apparent modes of argumentation and reasoning. To examine the structure of these arguments, this paper develops a theory ofExpand
Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument
Preface. I. DEVELOPING A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ARGUMENT. 1. Argument and Critical Thought. Critical Thought. Argumentation and Argument Argument Contexts 2. Co-Orientational View of Argument.Expand
A Reformulation of the Concept of Argument: The Constructivist/Interactionist Foundations of a Sociology of Argument
The traditional view of argument, based upon the positivistic assumption that argument is a “thing” experienced alike by all persons, is criticized, and an alternative view, grounded inExpand
Paradigms and Problems: Alternative Constructivist/Interactionist Implications for Argumentation Theory
The philosophical premises of personal construct theory and symbolic interactionism do not necessarily lead to the view of argument presented by Willard and are not incompatible with a defense of a...
Towards an account of argumentation in science
In this article it is argued that a complex model that includes Toulmin's functional account of argument, the pragma-dialectical stage analysis of argumentation offered by the Amsterdam School, andExpand
Persistent Questions in the Theory of Argument Fields
The concept of a “field” of arguments, introduced by Stephen Toulmin in 1958 with little explanation, seemed to scholars in the late 1970s and early 1980s to be a promising way to imagine standardsExpand
Practical reasoning in human affairs : studies in honor of Chaim Perelman
Introduction: Chaim Perelman's Address at the Ohio State University.- I: Argument.- The Changing Strategies of Argumentation from Ancient to Modern Times.- Implications of Perelman's Theory ofExpand
Rhetoric versus philosophy: The role of the universal audience in Chaim Perelman's The New Rhetoric
This paper is divided into three sections. The first describes how Perelman's general approach in The New Rhetoric, particularly his emphasis on the role of audience and the epistemological claims heExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...