• DOI:10.1124/jpet.106.117507
• Corpus ID: 11651502

Functional Selectivity of Hallucinogenic Phenethylamine and Phenylisopropylamine Derivatives at Human 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A and 5-HT2C Receptors

@article{Moya2007FunctionalSO,
  title={Functional Selectivity of Hallucinogenic Phenethylamine and Phenylisopropylamine Derivatives at Human 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A and 5-HT2C Receptors},
  author={Pablo R Moya and Kelly A Berg and Manuel A. Guti{\'e}rrez-Hern{\'a}ndez and Patricio S{\'a}ez-Briones and Miguel Reyes-Parada and Bruce K. Cassels and William P Clarke},
  journal={Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics},
  year={2007},
  volume={321},
  pages={1054 - 1061}
}

• P. Moya, K. Berg, +4 authors W. Clarke
• Published 1 June 2007
• Biology, Chemistry
• Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

2,5-Dimethoxy-4-substituted phenylisopropylamines and phenethylamines are 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) (5-HT)2A/2C agonists. The former are partial to full agonists, whereas the latter are partial to weak agonists. However, most data come from studies analyzing phospholipase C (PLC)-mediated responses, although additional effectors [e.g., phospholipase A2 (PLA2)] are associated with these receptors. We compared two homologous series of phenylisopropylamines and phenethylamines measuring both PLA2 and PLC responses in Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells expressing human 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors. In addition, we assayed both groups of compounds as head shake inducers in rats. At the 5-HT2C receptor, most compounds were partial agonists for both pathways. Relative efficacy of some phenylisopropylamines was higher for both responses compared with their phenethylamine counterparts, whereas for others, no differences were found. At the 5-HT2A receptor, most compounds behaved as partial agonists, but unlike findings at 5-HT2C receptors, all phenylisopropylamines were more efficacious than their phenethylamine counterparts. 2,5-Dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine activated only the PLC pathway at both receptor subtypes, 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine was selective for PLC at the 5-HT2C receptor, and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-nitrophenethylamine was PLA2-specific at the 5-HT2A receptor. For both receptors, the rank order of efficacy of compounds differed depending upon which response was measured. The phenylisopropylamines were strong head shake inducers, whereas their phenethylamine congeners were not, in agreement with in vitro results and the involvement of 5-HT2A receptors in the head shake response. Our results support the concept of functional selectivity and indicate that subtle changes in ligand structure can result in significant differences in the cellular signaling profile.