From what might have been to what must have been: counterfactual thinking creates meaning.

  title={From what might have been to what must have been: counterfactual thinking creates meaning.},
  author={Laura J. Kray and Linda G. George and Katie A. Liljenquist and Adam D. Galinsky and Philip E. Tetlock and Neal J. Roese},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  volume={98 1},
Four experiments explored whether 2 uniquely human characteristics-counterfactual thinking (imagining alternatives to the past) and the fundamental drive to create meaning in life-are causally related. Rather than implying a random quality to life, the authors hypothesized and found that counterfactual thinking heightens the meaningfulness of key life experiences. Reflecting on alternative pathways to pivotal turning points even produced greater meaning than directly reflecting on the meaning… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

When what happens tomorrow makes today seem meant to be : the meaning making function of counterfactual thinking.

The present research utilized a twostage cognitive account of the search for meaning to demonstrate that counterfactual thinking can serve a meaning-making function that provides explanatory coherence to a series of events.

Going to the other extreme: Counterfactual thinking leads to polarised judgements

Counterfactual thinking is often assumed to depend on closeness between what is and what might have been, following a principle of minimal mutations of reality. Yet when people are asked to describe

There But for the Grace of God

Past research suggests that thinking counterfactually leads to a perception that major life events are fated or predetermined. We hypothesized that a perception that events are fated will activate

The Making of Might-Have-Beens

Belief in free will was associated with an increase in the generation of self and upward counterfactuals, which have been shown to be particularly useful for learning.

“If only I had” versus “If only I had not”: Mental deletions, mental additions, and perceptions of meaning in life events

ABSTRACT The present research investigated the relationship between meaning perceptions and the structure of counterfactual thoughts. In Study 1, participants reflected on how turning points in their

Improving the past and the future: a temporal asymmetry in hypothetical thinking.

Two experiments show that, given the same experienced facts of reality, future imagination may differ from past reconstruction, and suggests that compared with prefactual thinking, counterfactual thinking may be less subject to reality checks and less likely to serve preparatory goals.

The Bidirectional Relation Between Counterfactual Thinking and Closeness, Controllability, and Exceptionality

In four experiments, we explored the inferences people make when they learn that counterfactual thinking has occurred. Experiment 1 (N = 40) showed that knowing that a protagonist had engaged in

It's not going to be that fun: negative experiences can add meaning to life.




Long Ago It Was Meant to Be: The Interplay Between Time, Construal, and Fate Beliefs

Two experiments revealed that construal level accounts for the relative plausibility of fate versus counterfactual explanations, and fate judgments were higher for temporally distant than recent past events, an effect mediated byconstrual perceptions.

Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability.

Research suggests that counterfactuals and preventability ascriptions play an important role in determining the perceived cause of a target outcome, but results indicate that the primary criterion used to recruit causal ascriptions (covariation) differs from that used to recruited counterfactUALs (controllability).

Counterfactual thinking.

  • N. Roese
  • Psychology
    Psychological bulletin
  • 1997
The author reviews research in support of the assertions that (a) counterfactual thinking is activated automatically in response to negative affect, (b) the content ofcounterfactuals targets particularly likely causes of misfortune, (c) counter Factuals produce negative affective consequences through a contrast-effect mechanism and positive inferential consequencesthrough a causal-inference mechanism, and (d) the net effect of counterfactUAL thinking is beneficial.

The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking

  • K. EpstudeN. Roese
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2008
An updated account of the functional theory of counterfactual thinking is provided, suggesting that such thoughts are best explained in terms of their role in behavior regulation and performance improvement.

The Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking

Part 1: Counterfactuals, Causality and Mental Representation. Counterfactual and Causal Explanation: From Early Theoretical Views to New Frontiers D.R. Mandel. The Relation between Counterfactual and

Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets.

It is demonstrated that the detrimental effect ofcounterfactual mind-sets is limited to creative tasks involving novel idea generation; in a creative association task involving the consideration of relationships between task stimuli, counterfactualMind-sets improved performance.

Poking Counterfactual Holes in Covering Laws: Cognitive Styles and Historical Reasoning

We report a series of studies of historical reasoning among professional observers of world politics. The correlational studies demonstrate that experts with strong theoretical commitments to a

The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations

  • S. HeineT. ProulxK. Vohs
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2006
The meaning maintenance model (MMM) proposes that people have a needfor meaning; that is, a need to perceive events through a prism of mental representations of expected relations that organizes

Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence

Three studies examined the effects of expectancy violation and outcome valence on spontaneous counterfactual thinking. In Study 1, prior expectations and outcome valence were varied orthogonally in a

The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thoughts (“might-have-been” reconstructions of past outcomes) may serve an affective function (feeling better) and a preparative function (future improvement). Three studies showed