Corpus ID: 157406964

From the LGBT Ad-Hoc Committee: Open Invitation to Allies

  title={From the LGBT Ad-Hoc Committee: Open Invitation to Allies},
  author={Larry R Martinez and Thomas Sasso and Nicholas P. Salter},
April 2014 Volume 51 Issue 4 At the 2013 SIOP conference in Houston, it was brought to our attention that some SIOP members felt that the the LGBT Committee was only for LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) individuals, in large part because of the name of the committee. After some debate, we decided that the name of the committee should remain the same for branding/ recognition purposes but that we needed to do a better job of clarifying exactly who we are and what we do to the… Expand


Neo-Activism: Engaging Allies in Modern Workplace Discrimination Reduction
The focal article by Lindsey, King, Dunleavy, McCausland, and Jones (2013) provides a detailed overview of the existing organizational literature on strategies to reduce workplace discrimination. InExpand
Trans-Parency in the Workplace: How the Experiences of Transsexual Employees Can Be Improved.
Abstract Very little research has focused exclusively on the workplace experiences of transsexual employees. Studies that have been done are either qualitative case studies (e.g., Budge, Tebbe, &Expand
Making the invisible visible: fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work.
Using a national sample of 534 gay, lesbian, and bisexual employees, this study examined the antecedents that affect the degree of disclosure of a gay identity at work and the factors that influence their fears about full disclosure. Expand
The relationship among reported disclosure of sexual orientation, anti-discrimination policies, top management support and work attitudes of gay and lesbian employees.
There is currently very little research to support the popularly held claim that “closeted” homosexual workers will have a less positive work‐related attitude and no empirical investigation ofExpand
The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: "coming out" at work.
Self-acceptance, the centrality of one's identity, how "out" one is to friends and family, employer policies, and perceived employer gay-supportiveness were associated with disclosure behaviors at work for gay/lesbian employees. Expand
Confronting Prejudice (Literally): Reactions to Confrontations of Racial and Gender Bias
Target confrontations elicited less guilt but greater discomfort than nontarget confrontations and were associated with feelings of irritation and antagonism among more prejudiced participants, whereas allegations of racial bias elicited more guilt and apologetic-corrective responses. Expand
Stop Complaining! The Social Costs of Making Attributions to Discrimination
Recent research indicates that stigmatized people may avoid claims of discrimination because such attributions are costly in terms of perceived control over outcomes and social self-esteem. TheExpand
Pink triangles: antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees.
Gay employees were more likely to report discrimination when employed in groups that were primarily heterosexual and in organizations that lacked supportive policies and were not covered by protective legislation. Expand
Standing up for a change: reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation.
Although confrontations elicited negative emotions and evaluations toward the confronter, participants also experienced negative self-directed affect and the effect of the confrontation generalized to reporting less prejudiced attitudes. Expand
The secretary read a note to the Academy from Dr. James Dale, retiring editor, in which he expressed his appreciation to the membership for their cooperation during his 5 year term of office. He alsoExpand