From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study

@article{Porcari2019FromRP,
  title={From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study},
  author={Andrea Porcari and Elisabetta Borsella and Christina Benighaus and Khara D. Grieger and Panagiotis Isigonis and Somik Chakravarty and Pete Kines and Keld Alstrup Jensen},
  journal={Journal of Nanoparticle Research},
  year={2019},
  volume={21}
}
Nanotechnology is widely used in several industrial and consumer sectors and has the potential to grow further and expand globally. An exploration of stakeholder (SH)’s perceptions is essential to ensuring that robust risk governance processes are in place for nanotechnology and nano-related products. In response, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate SH’s perceptions of nanotechnology and nano-related products over the past 15 years. To build on this work and to capture current… 

Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies Demonstrated in Terms of its Applicability to Nanomaterials.

TLDR
This paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art regarding risk governance of NMs and lays out the theoretical basis for the development and implementation of an effective, trustworthy and transparent risk governance framework for NMs.

Risk Perceptions and Safety Cultures in the Handling of Nanomaterials in Academia and Industry

TLDR
The study underscores the need for politicians and engineers to collaborate with communication experts and both natural and social scientists in effectively framing information on NMs to allow for flexible deployment of multilevel and integrated safety culture initiatives to support sustainable nanotechnology and operational excellence.

What Role Does Regulation Play in Responsible Innovation of Nanotechnology in Food and Agriculture? Insights and Framings from U.S. Stakeholders

Historically, market regulation has played an important role in shaping the trajectory of scientific and technological innovation in food and agriculture. However, regulators’ traditional focus on

(Re)Conceptualizing decision-making tools in a risk governance framework for emerging technologies—the case of nanomaterials

The utility of decision-making tools for the risk governance of nanotechnology is at the core of this paper. Those working in nanotechnology risk management have been prolific in creating such tools,

TRAAC framework for regulatory acceptance and wider usability of tools and methods for safe innovation and sustainability of manufactured nanomaterials

There has been an unprecedented use of advanced materials, particularly manufactured nanomaterials, in industrial applications and consumer products across several sectors in the last two decades.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 53 REFERENCES

Expert stakeholders’ perception of nanotechnology: risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation

This study is positioned in a multidisciplinary research field addressing questions of innovation, foresight, risk perception, regulation, and the role of stakeholder experts as regards nanomaterials

Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes

TLDR
Policy makers should consider the disparities in risk and trust perceptions between the public and influential stakeholders, placing greater emphasis on risk communication and the uncertainties of risk assessment in these areas of higher concern.

Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies.

TLDR
It is found that unfamiliarity with nanotechnology is, contrary to expectations, not strongly associated with risk aversion and reduced 'knowledge deficits' are correlated with positive perceptions in this early and controversy-free period, suggesting that risk judgements are highly malleable.

Altruism and skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnologies

TLDR
It is proposed that paying attention to altruism and skepticism may guide more responsible development of nano-food in the future and represent a convergence point among theories that each help explain different aspects of both how food nanotechnologies are perceived and why those perceptions are formed.

Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework

Existing literature in people’s attitude toward nanotechnology and acceptance of nanotechnology applications has generally investigated the impact of factors at the individual or context levels.

Risk perceptions starting to shift? U.S. citizens are forming opinions about nanotechnology

TLDR
Early results from an opinion formation study based on a 76-member panel of U.S. citizens suggest that responding to public concerns may involve more than attention to physical risks in areas such as health and environment; concerns about other forms of risk actually appear more salient.

From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology

Public opinion research on nanotechnology has primarily focused on judgments of abstract risks and benefits, rather than attitudes toward specific applications. This approach will be less useful as

Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards

TLDR
Public perception of nanotechnology may influence the realization of technological advances and public concerns about nanotechnology would diminish if measures were taken to enhance laypeople's trust in governmental agencies.

Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualised

Understanding public perceptions of and attitudes to nanotechnology is important in order to understand and facilitate processes of dialogue and public participation. This research quantitatively
...