From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology?

  title={From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': what are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology?},
  author={Joshua D. Greene},
  journal={Nature Reviews Neuroscience},
Many moral philosophers regard scientific research as irrelevant to their work because science deals with what is the case, whereas ethics deals with what ought to be. Some ethicists question this is/ought distinction, arguing that science and normative ethics are continuous and that ethics might someday be regarded as a natural social science. I agree with traditional ethicists that there is a sharp and crucial distinction between the 'is' of science and the 'ought' of ethics, but maintain… 

Morally irrelevant factors: What's left of the dual process-model of moral cognition?

Current developments in empirical moral psychology have spawned a new perspective on the traditional metaethical question of whether moral judgment is based on reason or emotion. Psychologists and

Moral philosophy and the aetiology of moral experience

What is the significance of empirical work on moral judgement for moral philosophy? Although the more radical conclusions that some writers have attempted to draw from this work are overstated, few

On the normative significance of experimental moral psychology

Experimental research in moral psychology can be used to generate debunking arguments in ethics. Specifically, research can indicate that we draw a moral distinction on the basis of a morally

Cognitive Scientific Challenges to Morality

Recent findings in neuroscience, evolutionary biology and psychology seem to threaten the existence or the objectivity of morality. Moral theory and practice is founded, ultimately, upon moral

As you were?

What is the significance of empirical work on moral judgement for moral philosophy? Although the more radical conclusions that some writers have attempted to draw from this work are overstated, few

The Moral Nativism, a new Paradigm of Moral Development, contributions from the Cognition and Neuroscience

This paper presents new approaches to moral development, moral intuitionism, dual processing, moral brain, and universal moral; all these topics had been generated from research in recent years. For

Cognitive Neuroscience and Moral Decision-making: Guide or Set Aside?

It is by now a well-supported hypothesis in cognitive neuroscience that there exists a functional network for the moral appraisal of situations. However, there is a surprising disagreement amongst

Critique of Moral Judgment: Sociology Versus Neuroscience

whether neuroethicists use psychological evidence or not would depend on their own understanding of neuroethics. While I fully agree with the author that neuroscience can give us new tools to assess

Does Neuroscience Undermine Deontological Moral Theory?

  • Philosophy, Psychology
  • 2014
Joshua Greene has argued that several lines of empirical research, including his own fMRI studies of brain activity during moral decisionmaking, comprise strong evidence against the legitimacy of



Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals

Immanuel Kant's "Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals" is one of the most important texts in the history of ethics. In it Kant searches for the supreme principle of morality and argues for a

An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment

It is argued that moral dilemmas vary systematically in the extent to which they engage emotional processing and that these variations in emotional engagement influence moral judgment.

The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

  • J. Haidt
  • Psychology
    Psychological review
  • 2001
The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached.

The Neural Mechanisms of Moral Cognition: A Multiple-Aspect Approach to Moral Judgment and Decision-Making

We critically review themushrooming literature addressing the neuralmechanisms of moral cognition (NMMC), reachingthe following broad conclusions: (1) researchmainly focuses on three

Moral cognition and its neural constituents

The current evidence allows us to draw a tentative conclusion: the moral psychology required by virtue theory is the most neurobiologically plausible.

Toward a Cognitive Neurobiology of the Moral Virtues

Soulignant l'interaction et la reciprocite de la neurobiologie cognitive et de la theorie morale metaethique au sein du programme d'une ethique de la vertu inspiree par Aristote et defendue par des

Living high and letting die : our illusion of innocence

By contributing a few hundred dollars to a charity like UNICEF, a prosperous person can ensure that fewer poor children die, and that more will live reasonably long, worthwhile lives. Even when

Neuroethics: an agenda for neuroscience and society

  • J. Moreno
  • Psychology
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience
  • 2003
The last decades of the twentieth century saw the rise of modern genetics, but whereas the ethics of genetics was in many ways a new conversation, the philosophical discussion of mental function and behaviour is an ancient tradition that both informs and complicates the emerging field of neuroethics.

On Human Nature

HUMAN nature as understood by that most pessimistic of philosophers, Schopenhauer, is here presented in English dress by Mr. Saunders. The essays which make up the book have been selected and


This revised translation of Aristotle's classic treatise contains ten books based on the famous doctrine of the golden mean which advocates taking the middle course between excess and deficiency.