From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements
@article{Koszowy2022FromTO, title={From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements}, author={Marcin Koszowy and Katarzyna Budzynska and Martin Pereira-Fari{\~n}a and Rory Duthie}, journal={Argumentation}, year={2022}, volume={36}, pages={123-149} }
In their book Commitment in Dialogue , Walton and Krabbe claim that formal dialogue systems for conversational argumentation are “not very realistic and not easy to apply”. This difficulty may make argumentation theory less well adapted to be employed to describe or analyse actual argumentation practice. On the other hand, the empirical study of real-life arguments may miss or ignore insights of more than the two millennia of the development of philosophy of language, rhetoric, and…
5 Citations
From Theory of Rhetoric to the Practice of Language Use: The Case of Appeals to Ethos Elements
- PhilosophyArgumentation
- 2022
In their book Commitment in Dialogue, Walton and Krabbe claim that formal dialogue systems for conversational argumentation are “not very realistic and not easy to apply”. This difficulty may make…
Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference
- PhilosophyArgumentation
- 2022
Arguments may sometimes be advanced with a non-standard function. One such function, it is suggested, is the expression of identity, a practice which may play a significant role in political…
Conventional Implicatures in Argumentation
- PhilosophyLanguages
- 2022
Despite the ubiquity of conventional implicatures in language and the critical role they play in argumentation, they have heretofore been almost entirely absent from theories of argument and the…
“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing
- PsychologyArgumentation
- 2022
This is a descriptive study (N = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish…
Towards a Holistic View on Argument Quality Prediction
- Computer ScienceArXiv
- 2022
Grounded on rich results from thorough empirical evaluations, this work assesses the generalization capabilities of argument quality estimation across diverse domains, the interplay with related argument mining tasks, and the impact of emotions on perceived argument strength.
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
Ethotic arguments and fallacies: The credibility function in multi-agent dialogue systems
- Philosophy
- 1999
In this paper, it is shown how formal dialectic can be extended to model multi-agent argumentation in which each participant is an agent. An agent is viewed as a participant in a dialogue who not…
Framing fracking
- Computer ScienceJournal of Argumentation in Context
- 2019
An empirical methodology (macroscope) is provided that identifies, from large quantities of text data through semantic frame analysis, the many players, positions and places presumed relevant to argumentation in a controversy.
Annotating Argument Schemes
- PhilosophyArgumentation
- 2021
The annotation of the preexisting US2016 corpus of televised election debates is extended, resulting in the two largest consistently annotated corpora of schemes in argumentative dialogue publicly available.
Deference, Distrust, and Delegation: Three Design Hypotheses
- Art
- 2015
Design thinking in argumentation involves speculative inquiry into alternative ways of carrying out the broad human project of becoming more reasonable. Design inquiry may or may not be accompanied…
Strategies of Character Attack
- Psychology
- 2013
Why are personal attacks so powerful? In political debates, speeches, discussions and campaigns, negative character judgments, aggressive charges and charged epithets are used for different purposes.…
Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?
- Philosophy
- 2001
1. Expertise and Testimony Mainstream epistemology is a highly theoretical and abstract enterprise. Traditional epistemologists rarely present their deliberations as critical to the practical…
Epistemic and Deontic Authority in the Argumentum Ad Verecundiam
- PhilosophyPragmatics and Society
- 2019
The aim of this paper is to elaborate tools that would allow us
to analyse arguments from authority and guard against fallacious uses of them.
To accomplish this aim, we extend the list of…
A comparative study of political communication in televised pre-election debates in Poland and the United States of America
- SociologyResearch in Language
- 2019
Abstract This paper combines quantitative and qualitative methodologies to study the persuasive strategies employed by candidates taking part in televised pre-election debates in Poland and the…
Throwing The Baby Out With The Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities To Rampant Scepticism About Expertise
- Philosophy
- 2014
In this paper, I argue that many arguments from expert opinion are strong arguments. Therefore, in many cases it is rational to rely on experts since in many cases the fact that an expert says that p…
The Legitimacy Crisis of Arguments from Expert Opinion: Can’t We Trust Experts?
- PhilosophyArgumentation
- 2020
Recent disputes (Mizrahi in Inform Logic 33(1):57–79, 2013; Mizrahi in Inform Logic 36(2):238–252, 2016; Mizrahi in Argumentation 32(2):175–195, 2018; Seidel in Inform Logic 34(2):192–218, 2014;…