From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review

@article{Pontille2015FromME,
  title={From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review},
  author={D. Pontille and D. Torny},
  journal={Human Studies},
  year={2015},
  volume={38},
  pages={57-79}
}
Born in the 17th century, journal peer review is an extremely diverse technology, constantly torn between two often incompatible goals: the validation of manuscripts conceived as a collective industrial-like reproducible process performed to assert scientific statements, and the dissemination of articles considered as a means to spur scientific discussion, raising controversies, and civically challenging a state of knowledge. Such a situation is particularly conducive to clarifying the… Expand

Tables from this paper

A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.
This article is included in the Science Policy gateway
  • 2019
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
The state of the art in peer review
How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector
  • S. Cowley
  • Medicine, Psychology
  • Front. Psychol.
  • 2015
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 97 REFERENCES
The evolution of editorial peer review.
Editorial Judgments
Metrics or Peer Review? Evaluating the 2001 UK Research Assessment Exercise in Political Science
Peer Review for Journals as it Stands Today—Part 1
Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing
The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
  • M. Mahoney
  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • 2005
Bias in peer review
...
1
2
3
4
5
...