• Corpus ID: 154044618

From Colorblindness to Antibalkanization: An Emerging Ground of Decision in Race Equality Cases

@article{Siegel2011FromCT,
  title={From Colorblindness to Antibalkanization: An Emerging Ground of Decision in Race Equality Cases},
  author={Reva B. Siegel},
  journal={Yale Law Journal},
  year={2011},
  volume={120},
  pages={1}
}
For decades, the Supreme Court has sharply divided in equal protection race discrimination cases. As commonly described, the Justices disagree about whether the Equal Protection Clause is properly interpreted through a colorblind anticlassification principle concerned with individualism or through an antisubordination principle concerned with inequalities in group status. This Article uncovers a third perspective on equal protection in the opinions of swing Justices who have voted to uphold and… 
Municipal Reparations: Considerations and Constitutionality
Demands for racial justice are resounding, and in turn, various localities have considered issuing reparations to Black residents. Municipalities may be effective venues in the struggle for
Representing What: Gender, Race, Class, and the Struggle for the Identity and Legitimacy of Courts
This symposium addresses the relationship of diversity and pluralism to the judiciary. The phrase “Equal Treatment Under Law” was carved in the stone above the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court
Socioeconomic Status Discrimination
This Article makes the case for protecting socioeconomic status (SES) under discrimination statutes that govern employment, housing, education, voting, public accommodations, and credit/lending.
MAKING A CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
  • E. Berrey
  • Law
    Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
  • 2015
Abstract The politics of affirmative action are currently structured as a litigious conflict among elites taking polarized stances. Opponents call for colorblindness, and defenders champion
Wrestling with Gender: Constructing Masculinity by Refusing to Wrestle Women
In February of 2011, an Iowa high school boy captured national attention when he refused to wrestle a girl at the state championship meet. The media shaped the story into a tale that honored the boy
Affirmative Action in Education: Swing Justices and the Meaning of “Diversity”
O 17 November 2014, the Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (SFFA) filed a complaint against Harvard College in federal district court, alleging that the Harvard undergraduate admissions process
The Constitutionalization of Disparate Impact—Court-Centered and Popular Pathways: A Comment on Owen Fiss’s Brennan Lecture
Responding to Owen Fiss’s call for the Court to recognize the constitutional status of the Griggs principle, I question court-centered accounts of constitutional change and examine the constitutional
Vote Denial and Defense: Reaffirming the Constitutionality of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act
Election law advocates and scholars have revered the Voting Rights Act (VRA) as holding “super-statute” status. But the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder rattled this view after it ruled that
On Time, (In)equality, and Death
In recent years, American institutions have inadvertently encountered the bodies of former slaves with increasing frequency. Pledges of respect are common features of these discoveries, accompanied
Supreme Court "Majoritizing": What Justice O'connor and Justice Kennedy Can Tell Us about the near Future
I. INTRODUCTIONThe number five is one of the most important numbers in the United States: the number of votes needed for a majority on the United States Supreme Court. Few justices in recent history
...
...

References

Fitzpatrick , Strict Scrutiny of Facially Race - Neutral State Action and the Texas Ten Percent Plan , 53 B AYLOR L . R EV