From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey

  title={From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey},
  author={Andreas Peldszus and Manfred Stede},
  journal={Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell.},
In this paper, the authors consider argument mining as the task of building a formal representation for an argumentative piece of text. Their goal is to provide a critical survey of the literature on both the resulting representations i.e., argument diagramming techniques and on the various aspects of the automatic analysis process. For representation, the authors also provide a synthesized proposal of a scheme that combines advantages from several of the earlier approaches; in addition, the… 

Figures from this paper

Argumentation Mining on the Web from Information Seeking Perspective
It is argued that an annotation scheme for argumentation mining is a function of the task requirements and the corpus properties and it is found that the choice of the argument components to be annotated strongly depends on the register, the length of the document, and inherently on the literary devices and structures used for expressing argumentation.
University of Dundee Harnessing Rhetorical Figures for Argument Mining
The generalised, automated reconstruction of the reasoning structures underlying persuasive communication is an enormously challenging task. While this work in argument mining is increasingly
Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining
A pilot study on the connection between rhetorical figures and argumentation structure, which shows that some of the figures indeed correspond to passages of high argumentative density, relative to the text as a whole.
The Road Map to FAME: A Framework for Mining and Formal Evaluation of Arguments
The main project idea is to link the two perspectives on argumentation and their respective research agendas by employing controlled natural language as a convenient form of intermediate knowledge representation to develop a framework which integrates argument mining and formal argument evaluation.
Towards Explaining Natural Language Arguments with Background Knowledge
A framework for argument explicitation is proposed, a task that makes the structure of a natural language argument explicit, as well as the background knowledge the argument is built on, in the form of implicit premises or contextual knowledge.
The ReCAP Project
A new German corpus of 100 semantically annotated argument graphs from the domain of education politics has been created and is made available to the argumentation research community and a probabilistic ranking framework for argument retrieval is introduced, i.e. for finding good premises for a designated claim.
Clustering of Argument Graphs Using Semantic Similarity Measures
A k-medoid and an agglomerative clustering approach based on semantic similarity measures are proposed and compared based on a graph-based semantic measure that takes the structure of the argument into account with a semantic word2vec measure on the pure textual argument representation.
Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation
As more and more sophisticated software is created to allow the mining of arguments from natural language texts, this paper sets out to examine the suitability of the well-established and readily
Automatic argumentation mining and the role of stance and sentiment
Argumentation mining is a subfield of Computational Linguistics that aims at automatically finding arguments and their structural components in natural language text and two other applications that are popular in computational linguistics: sentiment analysis and stance detection are described.
An Analysis of Linear Argumentation Structure of Korean Debate Texts Using Sequential Modeling and Linguistic Features
Current studies on argument mining provide tree-structured argumentation structures based on relational nuclearities and discourse relations between sentences in each document. In this case,


Towards an Analysis of Argumentation Structure and the Strength of Arguments in News Editorials
Editorials in general fall under persuasive texts.These types of texts intend to persuade the readers over a certain issue or topic.Hence persuasion involves the use of persuasive elements(opinion
Some Facets of Argument Mining for Opinion Analysis
A conceptual semantics of the relations of evaluative expressions with a discourse structure such as an elaboration, an illustration, or a reformulation must also be interpreted as an argument is developed.
Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory
A hybrid scheme that enables an analyst to encode argumentation analysis within the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), which can be used to represent the discourse structure of a text is described and used for investigation of contexts that license omission of elements of an argument.
Argumentation mining
This work presents different methods to aid argumentation mining, starting with plain argumentation detection and moving forward to a more structural analysis of the detected argumentation.
Argumentation mining: the detection, classification and structure of arguments in text
This paper analyzes the main research questions when dealing with argumentation mining and the different methods studied and developed in order to successfully confront the challenges of argumentationmining in legal texts.
The Argument Interchange Format
ClaiMaker and related technologies provide a set of tools for individuals or distributed communities to publish and contest ideas and arguments, as is required in contested domains such as research literatures, intelligence analysis, or public debate.
Semi-Automated Argumentative Analysis of Online Product Reviews
A rule-based tool for semi-automatic text analysis support that highlights potential argumentative sections of a text according to terms indicative of arguments and domain terminology so that the resulting argumentation framework can be passed to argument evaluation tools.
Processing natural language arguments with theplatform
The platform has now reached a certain level of maturity which allows the recognition of a large diversity of discourse structures including general-purpose rhetorical structures as well as domain-specific discourse structures.
Argumentative Text as Rhetorical Structure: An Application of Rhetorical Structure Theory
Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), as a tool for analyzing written texts, is particularly appropriate for analyzing argumentative texts. The distinction that RST makes between the part of a text that