• Corpus ID: 146422611

Fritz Zwicky, Morphologie and Policy Analysis

@inproceedings{Ritchey1998FritzZM,
  title={Fritz Zwicky, Morphologie and Policy Analysis},
  author={Tom Ritchey},
  year={1998}
}
Fritz Zwicky pioneered the development of morphological analysis (MA) as a method for investigating the totality of relationships contained in multi-dimensional, usually nonquantifiable problem complexes. During the past two decades, MA has been extended and applied in the area of futures studies and for structuring and analysing complex policy spaces. This article outlines the fundamentals of the morphological approach and describes recent applications in policy analysis. 

General Morphological Analysis * A general method for non-quantified modelling

TLDR
The fundamentals of the morphological approach are outlined and an application in policy analysis is described.

Strategic Decision Support using Computerised Morphological Analysis

General Morphological Analysis (GMA), pioneered by Fritz Zwicky at the California Institute of Technology in the 1930s and 40s, was developed as a method for structuring and investigating the total

Modeling Alternative Futures with General Morphological Analysis

TLDR
The fundamentals of the morphological approach are outlined and its use in a number of case studies in scenario development and futures projections done for Swedish government authorities and NGOs are described.

General Morphological Analysis (GMA)

General Morphological Analysis (GMA) is a method for structuring and investigating the total set of relationships contained in multi-dimensional, non-quantifiable, problem complexes. It was

Nuclear Facilities and Sabotage : Using Morphological Analysis as a Scenario and Strategy Development Laboratory

Modelling complex socio-technical systems and threat scenarios presents us with a number of difficult methodological problems. Most of the parameters involved are not meaningfully quantifiable, and

Developing Scenario Laboratories with Computer-Aided Morphological Analysis

TLDR
The fundamentals of the morphological approach are outlined and its use in a number of case studies in scenario development done for the Swedish Armed Forces and other defense agencies between 1997 and 2007 are described.

Winchester International OR Conference, England 2002

SUMMARY Morphological analysis (MA) is a non-quantified modelling method for structuring and analysing technical, organisational and social problem complexes. It is well suited for developing

Integration of qualitative and quantitative data for decision aiding in production planning

TLDR
Basically, general morphological analysis (MA) is a method for identifying and investigating the total set of possible relationships or “configurations” contained in a given problem complex.

Evaluating a Swedish Airborne Combat Capability using Computer Supported Morphological Analysis

General morphological analysis (MA) is a method for structuring and analysing the total set of relationships contained in multi-dimensional, non-quantifiable problem complexes, and for synthesising

Combining morphological analysis and Bayesian Networks for strategic decision support

TLDR
Short summaries of MA and BN are provided in this paper, followed by discussions how these two computer aided methods may be combined to better facilitate modelling procedures.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 11 REFERENCES

Analysis and synthesis: On scientific method – based on a study by bernhard riemann

TLDR
The foundations of analysis and synthesis as scientific methods, and especially the requirements for the successful application of these methods, are dealt with.

Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques.

Typologies and Taxonomies in Social Science Classical Typology Construction (Pre-Computer) Numerical Taxonomy and Cluster Analysis Relations among Techniques Summary and Conclusions

Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling

Organizational typologies have proved to be a popular approach for thinking about organizational structures and strategies. Authors developing typologies, however, have been criticized for developing