Friendly Atheism, Skeptical Theism, and the Problem of Evil

@article{Rowe2006FriendlyAS,
  title={Friendly Atheism, Skeptical Theism, and the Problem of Evil},
  author={William L. Rowe},
  journal={International Journal for Philosophy of Religion},
  year={2006},
  volume={59},
  pages={79-92}
}
  • W. Rowe
  • Published 1 April 2006
  • Philosophy
  • International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

Rowe, William L.

  • J. Jordan
  • The Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Religion
  • 2021

Hopeism

The Sceptical Response to the Existential Problem of Systemic Suffering

Abstract Recently, Yujin Nagasawa has argued that “systemic suffering” – suffering inherent in the evolutionary process – poses a problem for existentially optimistic theists and atheists who think

Skeptical Theism Proved

  • Perry Hendricks
  • Philosophy
    Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • 2020
Abstract Skeptical theism is a popular response to arguments from evil. Many hold that it undermines a key inference often used by such arguments. However, the case for skeptical theism is often kept

A Rejection of Skeptical Theism

The evidential problem of evil has become an important topic within the philosophy of religion. This formulation of the problem of evil states that it is unlikely that God exists given the existence

The Problem of Evil

Sceptical Theism and the Paradox of Evil

ABSTRACT Given plausible assumptions about the nature of evidence and undercutting defeat, many believe that the force of the evidential problem of evil depends on sceptical theism’s being false: if

Skeptical Theism, Free Will Skepticism and Atheism: Pondering the Scope of Moral Paralysis

In this paper, I aim to show that Skeptical Theism (ST) implies the rejection of Free Will Skepticism (FWS). This is so because ST holds the so-called evidential argument from evil against theism.

The Copernican principle, intelligent extraterrestrials, and arguments from evil

Abstract The physicist Richard Gott defends the Copernican principle, which claims that when we have no information about our position along a given dimension among a group of observers, we should