• Corpus ID: 43324945

# Frequentist vs Bayesian statistics - a non-statisticians view

```@article{Ambaum2012FrequentistVB,
title={Frequentist vs Bayesian statistics - a non-statisticians view},
author={Maarten H. P. Ambaum},
journal={arXiv: Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability},
year={2012}
}```
• M. Ambaum
• Published 10 August 2012
• Mathematics
• arXiv: Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
People who by training end up dealing with probabilities ("statisticians") roughly fall into one of two camps. One is either a frequentist or a Bayesian. To a scientist, who needs to use probabilities to make sense of the real world, this division seems sometimes baffling. I will argue that science mostly deals with Bayesian questions. Yet the dominance of frequentist ideas in statistics points many scientists in the wrong statistical direction.
4 Citations

### Equity Valuation and Fundamental Analysis: to Bayes or not to Bayes?

This paper discusses the benefits and drawbacks of adopting Bayesian inference for practical equity valuation and fundamental analysis and derives a decision-focused valuation model for investors.

### Defining Probability in Sex Offender Risk Assessment

• R. Elwood
• Psychology
International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology
• 2016
The two concepts of probability are reviewed and it is shown how the Bayesian view alone provides a coherent scheme to conceptualize individuals’ risk of sexual recidivism.

### Improving Flash Flood Forecasting with a Bayesian Probabilistic Approach: A Case Study on the Posina Basin in Italy

• Environmental Science
• 2019
 Abstract — The Flash Flood Guidance (FFG) provides the rainfall amount of a given duration necessary to cause flooding. The approach is based on the development of rainfall-runoff curves, which

## References

SHOWING 1-3 OF 3 REFERENCES

### Significance Tests in Climate Science

It is concluded that a significance test very rarely provides useful quantitative information.

### The earth is round (p < .05)

After 4 decades of severe criticism, the ritual of null hypothesis significance testing (mechanical dichotomous decisions around a sacred .05 criterion) still persists. This article reviews the

### , 2001 : The insignificance of significance testing

• atmospheric science :
• 2003