Freedom of Speech as Related to Journalists in the ECtHR, IACtHR and the Human Rights Committee – a Study of Fragmentation

  title={Freedom of Speech as Related to Journalists in the ECtHR, IACtHR and the Human Rights Committee – a Study of Fragmentation},
  author={Marjan Ajevski},
  journal={Nordic Journal of Human Rights},
  pages={118 - 139}
In its report on the fragmentation in international law, the ILC decided not to deal with the issue of institutional fragmentation – the fragmentation of international law brought on by the existence of different institutions dealing with norms that are “normatively equivalent”. This is a study of institutional fragmentation within human rights law; specifically it is an attempt to gauge the extent of fragmentation through the case-law of three courts, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights… 
2 Citations
Abstract The margin of appreciation (MoA) has become the central conceptual doctrine in the institutional and jurisprudential architecture of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This
Labelling Speech
  • Frantisek Kasl
  • Challenging Online Propaganda and Disinformation in the 21st Century
  • 2021


Two Concepts of the Margin of Appreciation
The doctrine of the margin of appreciation that the European Court of Human Rights has developed in its case law has given rise to considerable criticism. In this article I draw a distinction between
Human Rights, Legitimacy, and International Law
The article begins with reflections on the nature, and basis, of human rights considered as moral standards. It recommends an orthodox view of their nature, as moral rights possessed by all human
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights : case law and commentary
Foreword Introduction Table of Cases List of Abbreviations PART I: PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES 1. The optional contentious jurisdiction of the Court 2. The indirect contentious jurisdiction of the Court 3.
The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law
The European Court of Human Rights has increasingly relied on the "margin of appreciation" as a tool for interpreting the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights
Since the first edition of Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights in 1978, this book has become a reference in the field of human rights in Europe. It provides a systematic
Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism
Over the past fifty years, proportionality balancing – an analytical procedure akin to strict scrutiny in the United States – has become a dominant technique of rights adjudication in the world. From
The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality
1. Introduction PART ONE - THEORY: CONCEPTUALIZING AND JUSTIFYING THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION 2. Deference: Reasoning Differently On The Basis Of External Factors 3. Different Approaches To Deference
Multi-sourced equivalent norms in international law
1 The International Law and Policy of Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms Tomer Broude and Yuval Shany PART I MSENS AND THE FRAGMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 2 Conflict of Norms or Conflict of Laws?
Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights
1. The creation of the Convention 2. The Strasbourg system for determining applications under the Convention 3. Article 1 Obligation to respect human rights 4. Article 2 Right to life 5. Article 3
Compulsory Membership in an Association Prescribed by Law for the Practice of Journalism
  • Law, Political Science
    International Law Reports
  • 1987
Human rights — Freedom of expression — Nature of right — Whether absolute or qualified — Restrictions upon — Public interest — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969 — Articles 13 and 29 —