Free choice permission and the counterfactuals of pragmatics

@article{Fusco2014FreeCP,
  title={Free choice permission and the counterfactuals of pragmatics},
  author={Melissa Fusco},
  journal={Linguistics and Philosophy},
  year={2014},
  volume={37},
  pages={275-290}
}
  • Melissa Fusco
  • Published 31 July 2014
  • Philosophy
  • Linguistics and Philosophy
This paper addresses a little puzzle with a surprisingly long pedigree and a surprisingly large wake: the puzzle of Free Choice Permission. I begin by presenting a popular sketch of a pragmatic solution to the puzzle, due to Kratzer and Shimoyama (Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, 2002), which has received a good deal of discussion, endorsement and elaboration in recent work (Aloni and van Rooij, Proccedings of the KNAW Academy Colloquium: Cognitive foundations of… 

Deontic Modality and the Semantics of Choice

A unified solution to Ross’s puzzle and free choice permission is proposed and a generalization of the classical semantics for disjunction is combined that explains the puzzling facts in terms of semantic consequence.

Logic and conversation: The case of free choice

  • M. Aloni
  • Philosophy
    Semantics and Pragmatics
  • 2022
Free choice inferences represent a much discussed case of a divergence between logic and language (Kamp 1973, Zimmermann 2000). Grice influentially argued that the assumption that such divergence

An Investigation of a Gricean Account of Free-Choice or

Free-choice disjunction manifests itself in complements of comparatives, existential modals, and related contexts. For example, “Socrates is older than Plato or Aristotle” is usually understood to

Semantic expressivism for epistemic modals

Expressivists about epistemic modals deny that ‘Jane might be late’ canonically serves to express the speaker’s acceptance of a certain propositional content. Instead, they hold that it expresses a

Choice Points for a Modal Theory of Disjunction

This paper investigates the prospects for a semantic theory that treats disjunction as a modal operator. Potential motivation for such a theory comes from the way in which modals (and especially, but

Free choice reasons

This work extends theories of nonmonotonic reasoning to account for reasons allowing free choice and uses an Anderson–Kanger reduction of reason statements, identifying key principles in the logic of reasons.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES

Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects: Experimental Data

Universal inferences like (i) have been taken as evidence for a local/syntactic treatment of scalar implicatures (i.e. theories where the enrichment of "some" into "some but not all" can happen

GAME THEORY AND SCALAR IMPLICATURES

It is argued that weak-dominance reasoning, a standard form of game-theoretic reasoning, allows us to cash out scalar implicatures as rational inferences in a large class of communicative situations.

Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics

A framework for pragmatic analysis is proposed which treats discourse as a game, with context as a scoreboard organized around the questions under discussion by the interlocutors, and it is argued that the prosodic focus of an utterance canonically serves to reflect the question under discussion, placing additional constraints on felicity in context.

Scorekeeping in a language game

It’s not as easy as you might think to say something that will be unacceptable for lack of required presuppositions, and straightway that presupposition springs into existence, making what you said acceptable after all.

Free Choice Items and Alternatives

Extending the proposal made by Schulz (2003), we put forward a pragmatic account of the meaning of existential and universal FC items, where the ‘ignorance or indierence’ inference triggered by the

Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language

This article presents a unified theory of polarity-sensitive items (PSIs) based on the notion of domain widening. PSIs include negative polarity items (like Italian mai ever), universal free choice

Scalar implicature and local pragmatics.

It is argued that, for the most part, observations can be accounted for within a Gricean framework, and without resorting to local pragmatic inferences of any kin d, but there remains a small class of marked cases that cannot be treated as conversational implicatures, and they do require a local mode of pragmatic interpretation.

Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics

Notes on Contributors Introduction: U.Sauerland & P.Stateva Quantifier Dependent Readings of Anaphoric Presuppositions S.Beck Licensing or R.Eckardt Free Choice and the Theory of Scalar Implicatures

Dividing things up: The semantics of or and the modal/or interaction

In this paper, the meanings of sentences containing the word or and a modal verb are used to arrive at a novel account of the meaning of or coordinations. It is proposed that or coordinations denote
...