Free choice, modals, and imperatives

  title={Free choice, modals, and imperatives},
  author={Maria Aloni},
  journal={Natural Language Semantics},
  • M. Aloni
  • Published 29 June 2007
  • Philosophy
  • Natural Language Semantics
The article proposes an analysis of imperatives and possibility and necessity statements that (i) explains their differences with respect to the licensing of free choice any and (ii) accounts for the related phenomena of free choice disjunction in imperatives, permissions, and statements. Any and or are analyzed as operators introducing sets of alternative propositions. Free choice licensing operators are treated as quantifiers over these sets. In this way their interpretation can be sensitive… 

Permission and Choice

This paper provides an analysis of two related properties of imperatives: (i) their variation in discourse function and (ii) their licensing of free choice inferences. With regard to (i), it is

Licensing free choice any on an existential semantics for imperatives

This paper seeks to explain why free choice any is licensed in strong imperatives and weak imperatives but not under strong modals. It argues that this contrast can be accounted for on the assumption

A logical account of free-choice imperatives

An account in which imperatives are regarded as partial specifications of a set of options is proposed and shows that this account avoids Ross’s paradox and gives rise to a sensible notion of imperative entailment.

(Partially) Free choice of alternatives

It is shown that the Romanian indefinite vreun occurrences are restricted to negative polarity and a subset of modal contexts, and it is proposed that the epistemic constraint arises from the lexicalization of an inference that non-epistemic operators can never satisfy.

Free choice is a form of dependence

This paper refutes the widespread view that disjunctions of imperatives invariably grant free choice between the actions named by their disjuncts. Like other disjunctions they can also express a

Simplifying with Free Choice

This paper offers a unified semantic explanation of two observations that prove to be problematic for classical analyses of modals, conditionals, and disjunctions: (1) the fact that disjunctions

Expressing permission

This paper proposes a semantics for free choice permission that explains both the non-classical behavior of modals and disjunction in sentences used to grant permission, and their classical behavior

Sluicing on free choice

It is argued that the time-honored ‘I don’t know which’-riders on Free Choice sentences, traditionally taken to show that the effect is pragmatic, are sensitive to scope.

Free choice of alternatives

This paper contributes to the semantic typology of dependent indefinites, by accounting for the distribution and interpretation of the Romanian indefinite vreun. It is shown that its occurrences are

Pick some but not all alternatives

This work makes use of the independently established fact that imperatives can give rise to weak free choice inferences (akin to partial variation) to enable a uniform characterization of the contexts of occurrence of vreun as contexts that satisfy the partial variation requirement imposed by vre un.




This article proposes a new analysis of modal expressions which (i) explains the difference between necessity and possibility modals with respect to the licensing of Free Choice any and (ii) accounts


The goal of this article is to explain the distribution and meaning of qualsiasi/qualunque in the examples in (1). Universal FC items will be analysed as indefinites (contra Dayal, 1998). Following

Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility

This paper offers an explanation of the fact that sentences of the form (1) ‘X may A or B’ may be construed as implying (2) ‘X may A and X may B’, especially if they are used to grant permission. It

Free Choice Items and Alternatives

Extending the proposal made by Schulz (2003), we put forward a pragmatic account of the meaning of existential and universal FC items, where the ‘ignorance or indierence’ inference triggered by the

The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types

The contrast between imperatives and promissives brings out the issue well. These two types are functionally very similar: An imperative places a requirement on the addressee, while a promissive

On choice-offering imperatives

An analysis of modal expressions is extended to imperatives to allow a unified account of the phenomena in (1)-(4) and this article will start by presenting the ‘alternative’ analysis for indefinites and disjunction.

The Meaning of Free Choice

This paper discusses the distribution and interpretation of free choice items (FCIs) in Greek, a language exhibiting a lexical paradigm of such items distinct from that of negative polarity items, and argues that FCIs are not universal quantifiers but indefinites.

Any as Inherently Modal

It is argued that FC any is not directly licensed by modal or generic operators as generally assumed but that its felicitous use is sensitive to the pragmatics of epistemic modality.

Entertaining Alternatives: Disjunctions as Modals

Following Zimmermann (2000), I propose that disjunctions are to be treated as conjunctions of modal propositions, and that the essential contribution of ‘or’ is merely to present a list of

Epistemic Containment

This article concerns a new constraint on the interaction of quantifier phrases and epistemic modals. It is argued that QPs cannot bind their traces across an epistemic modal, though it is shown that