Framing the concept of TWAIL: “Third World Approaches to International Law” | Enquadrando o conceito de TWAIL: “Abordagens do Terceiro Mundo ao Direito Internacional”

  title={Framing the concept of TWAIL: “Third World Approaches to International Law” | Enquadrando o conceito de TWAIL: “Abordagens do Terceiro Mundo ao Direito Internacional”},
  author={Larissa Ramina},
Framing the concept of TWAIL: “Third World Approaches to International Law” Abstract: The authors who identify themselves as “twailers” advocate for the importance of the thoughts related to the concept of “Third World Approaches to International Law”, known as TWAIL. This paper first explains the importance of understanding the concept of TWAIL - “Third World Approaches to Internacional Law”. Afterwards, it frames the concept of TWAIL according to some of its main scholars, considering… 
3 Citations

The Promise of International Law: A Third World View

This is a moment of repudiation of international law and of reckoning with racial injustice and committing to anti-racism. Some of the leading States that have shaped international law are not only

Descolonização do direito internacional

Esse artigo apresenta, desde perspectivas de enfrentamento às múltiplas formas do colonialismo, o diagnóstico de que o capitalismo e o colonialismo também estruturam desigualdades na maneira como o

The Nation and the State

TWAIL as Naturalized Epistemological Inquiry

Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) scholarship provides a trenchant critique of the contemporary international law regime, using concrete historical and cultural evidence to

Critical Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL): Theory, Methodology, or Both?

This paper engages with the question of whether TWAIL is a theory, a methodology, or both. It takes the mainstream positivist understandings of the concepts of "theory" and "methodology" seriously in

Between Resistance and Reform: TWAIL and the Universality of International Law

In this article we explore the relationship between TWAIL scholarship and the universality of international law. In particular, we offer an account of this relation as the outcome of what we describe

Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto

* I would like to thank Antony Anghie for his comments on an earlier draft of the paper. The usual caveat applies. First published in: Antony Anghie, Bhupinder Chimni, Karin Mickelson and Obiora

What is TWAIL?

  • M. Mutua
  • Political Science
    Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting
  • 2000
The piece seeks to conceptualize the insurgent movement in international law known as Third World Approaches to International Law. Driven by scholars from the Third World, TWAIL rejects the

The Past, Present and Future of International Law: A Critical Third World Approach

A third world approach to international law, or TWAIL as it has come to be known, represents in general an attempt to understand the history, structure and process of international law from the

International Law and Its Discontents: Rethinking the Global South

I make three interrelated arguments: first, international law’s discontents have always been its peripheries, whose relationship to the core of international law has been historically captured by the

Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law

International law is universal. It is a body of law that applies to all states regardless of their specific cultures, belief systems, and political organizations. It is a common set of doctrines that

TWAIL: An Epistemological Inquiry

This paper argues that a particular critical conceptualization based on a focus on Third World peoples, their resistance and their histories offered by TWAIL holds immense potential for formulating

Newness, Imperialism, and International Legal Reform in Our Time: A Twail Perspective

We can only speak to these critical events ... as they unfold before our own eyes, from our own unhappy situatedness; the Clio's couch, the disengagement that only distance may bring, is not for us