Framing Feedback: Choosing Review Environment Features that Support High Quality Peer Assessment

@inproceedings{Hicks2016FramingFC,
  title={Framing Feedback: Choosing Review Environment Features that Support High Quality Peer Assessment},
  author={Catherine M. Hicks and Vineet Pandey and C. Ailie Fraser and Scott R. Klemmer},
  booktitle={CHI},
  year={2016}
}
Peer assessment is rapidly growing in online learning, as it presents a method to address scalability challenges. However, research suggests that the benefits of peer review are obtained inconsistently. This paper explores why, introducing three ways that framing task goals significantly changes reviews. Three experiments manipulated features in the review environment. First, adding a numeric scale to open text reviews was found to elicit more explanatory, but lower quality reviews. Second… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 21 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 9 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 13 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…