Fourth generation lithotripter: do we have a new benchmark for comparison?

@article{Autorino2008FourthGL,
  title={Fourth generation lithotripter: do we have a new benchmark for comparison?},
  author={Riccardo Autorino and Marco De Sio},
  journal={BJU international},
  year={2008},
  volume={101 5},
  pages={
          644
        }
}
terms of clinical success, 3-month stone-free rate, re-treatment rate, auxiliary procedures and EQ, this is comparable to that reported by Nomikos et al. [1]. Overall, it should be recognized that comparing the results achieved with various lithotripsy units at various institutions is difficult, if not impossible, due to variability in patient selection, definition of success, follow-up methods, and the reported use and classification of auxiliary procedures. In this setting, claiming a new… CONTINUE READING

Topics from this paper.