Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development

  title={Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development},
  author={Tom Crick},
This document aims to agree on a broad, international strategy for the implementation of open scholarship that meets the needs of different national and regional communities but works globally.Scholarly research can be idealised as an inspirational process for advancing our collective knowledge to the benefit of all humankind. However, current research practices often struggle with a range of tensions, in part due to the fact that this collective (or “commons”) ideal conflicts with the… 
Open scholarship in Australia: A review of needs, barriers, and opportunities
Only by better understanding barriers and needs across the university landscape can the authors address current challenges to open scholarship so research can be presented in usable and understandable ways, with data made more freely available for reuse by the broader public.
Toward Open Research: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for Open Humanities
Open research represents a new set of principles and methodologies for greater cooperation, transparent sharing of findings, and access to and re-use of research data, materials or outputs, making
The varying openness of digital open science tools
Background: Digital tools that support open science practices play a key role in the seamless accumulation, archiving and dissemination of scholarly data, outcomes and conclusions. Despite their
Towards Open Science for the Qualitative Researcher: From a Positivist to an Open Interpretation
This reflection by a qualitative researcher stems from a concrete experience with data handling in a funded research project. The researcher followed Open Research Data guidelines and found optimal
Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs)
A MOOP is considered to be distinct from a ‘traditional’ collaborative article in that it is defined by an openly participatory process, not bound within the constraints of a predefined contributors list.
Next‐generation field courses: Integrating Open Science and online learning
The opportunity for field courses to align teaching activities with the recent developments and trends in how the authors conduct research is highlighted, including training in: publishing registered reports, collecting data using standardized methods, adopting high‐quality data documentation, managing data through reproducible workflows, and sharing and publishing data through appropriate channels.
Open Science in Software Engineering
This chapter reflects upon the essentials in open science for software engineering including what open science is, why the authors should engage in it, and how to do it.
A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship
There is no clear-cut boundary between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship, and the histories, practices, and fundamental principles between the two remain complex. In this study, we
Open Science MOOC Response to UNESCO Draft Open Science Recommendations
The ​Open Science MOOC​ 2020 Steering Committee (​​) responds on behalf of our community to the UNESCO consultation on open science. We offer this response from our perspective
Digital Archiving by Nigerian and Foreign Authors in a Low Resource Context: A Content Analysis of Publications on Natural Language Processing of Nigerian Languages
Results shows that studies with foreign authorship shared their articles in non-commercial repositories, more than studies with Nigerian authorship, and it was recommended that librarians in Nigeria should create awareness on the benefits of digital archiving and open science.


Imagining the “open” university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education
Some of the challenges inherent to practicing open scholarship are described and some of the tensions created by incompatibilities between institutional policies and personal practice are described.
The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review.
This review aims to be a resource for current knowledge on the impacts of Open Access by synthesizing important research in three major areas: academic, economic and societal.
A genealogy of open access: negotiations between openness and access to research
Open access (OA) is a contested term with a complicated history and a variety of understandings. This rich history is routinely ignored by institutional, funder and governmental policies that instead
Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship
Researchers, educators, policymakers, and other education stakeholders hope and anticipate that openness and open scholarship will generate positive outcomes for education and scholarship. Given the
Do we need to move from communication technology to user community? A new economic model of the journal as a club
A way through is offered by demonstrating that a journal is a club by using examples, ranging from OA to prestige journals, to explain why congestion is a problem for club‐based publications, and to discuss the importance of creative destruction for the maintenance of knowledge‐generating communities in publishing.
Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry
The shift towards open innovation has substantially changed the academic and practical understanding of corporate innovation. While academic studies on open innovation are burgeoning, most research
How open science helps researchers succeed
There is evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices, including increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities.
Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language
This article aims to be a field guide for scientists who want to perform science in the open, offering resources and tips to make open science happen in the four key areas of data, code, publications and peer-review.
The Journal Impact Factor: A brief history, critique, and discussion of adverse effects
This chapter provides a brief history of the indicator and highlights well-known limitations-such as the asymmetry between the numerator and the denominator, differences across disciplines, the insufficient citation window, and the skewness of the underlying citation distributions.
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39
A model of how one group of actors managed this tension between divergent viewpoints was presented, drawing on the work of amateurs, professionals, administrators and others connected to the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley, during its early years.