Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?.

@article{Fuchs1993FormativeEO,
  title={Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?.},
  author={Lynn S. Fuchs},
  journal={School Psychology Review},
  year={1993},
  volume={22},
  pages={27-48}
}
  • L. Fuchs
  • Published 1993
  • Education
  • School Psychology Review
The purpose of this study was to examine students' weekly rates of academic growth, or slopes of achievement, when Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) is conducted repeatedly over 1 year. Using standard CBM procedures in reading, spelling, or math, students in Year 1 (n = 546) were measured once each week; students in Year 2 (n = 2,511) were measured at least monthly. Results provided corroborating data across years and interesting patterns for different types of measures. Findings are discussed… 

Tables from this paper

Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading: An Evaluation of Growth Rates and Seasonal Effects Among Students Served in General and Special Education

Abstract. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (CBM-R) is often used to benchmark growth in the fall, winter, and spring. CBM-R is also used to set goals and monitor student progress between

Evaluating Curriculum-Based Measurement from a Behavioral Assessment Perspective.

Curriculum-based measurement for reading (CBM-R) procedures were developed in the late 1970's and early 1980's as a set of standardized assessment tools for gauging students' academic performance in

An Evaluation of the Linearity of Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading (CBM-R) Progress Monitoring Data: Idiographic Considerations

Educators use curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (CBM-R) to measure student response to instruction. Current decision-making frameworks assume students demonstrate linear growth across a

Curriculum-Based Measurement and Standards-Based Mathematics

This purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a curriculum-based measure of word problem solving (CBM-WPS) as an indicator of performance and progress in a sample of 136

The Applicability of Curriculum-Based Measurement to Measure Reading in Hebrew

This study was an initial effort to examine the applicability of Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) procedures to measure reading in a language other than English and more specifically, in Hebrew.

Oral Reading Fluency Growth: A Sample of Methodology and Findings. Research Brief 6.

For the past 20 years, the growth of students’ oral reading fluency has been investigated by a number of researchers using curriculum-based measurement. These researchers have used varied methods

Monitoring elementary students’ writing progress using curriculum-based measures: grade and gender differences

The purpose of this study was to examine slopes from curriculum-based measures of writing (CBM-W) as indicators of growth in writing. Responses to story prompts administered for 5 min to 89 students

Curriculum Influences on Growth in Early Reading Fluency for Students with Academic and Behavioral Risks

This study applied an early screening approach to determine the risk status of children in five urban schools and monitor their patterns of reading growth over 3 years. A majority of students were
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES

Effects of Curriculum-Based Measurement and Consultation on Teacher Planning and Student Achievement in Mathematics Operations

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of (a) ongoing, systematic assessment of student growth (i.e., curriculum-based measurement) and (b) expert system instructional consultation on

Effects of Alternative Goal Structures within Curriculum-Based Measurement

This study assessed the effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement (CBM) in the area of math. Subjects were 30 special education teachers, assigned randomly to a

Curriculum-Based Measurement and Developmental Reading Models: Opportunities for Cross-Validation

Curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is a standardized form of curriculum-based assessment (CBA) that relies on rate samples to assess academic skills. These measures were empirically derived, but the

The Contribution of Skills Analysis to Curriculum-Based Measurement in Spelling

The purpose of this study was to assess the contribution of ongoing skills analysis to Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM). Thirty special educators were assigned randomly to treatment groups,

The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of Learning

This study examined the educational effects of repeated curriculum-based measurement and evaluation. Thirty-nine special educators, each having three to four pupils in the study, were assigned

Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children

A new volume focusing on the broader application of curriculum-based measurement, providing practical new measures, as well as detailing their use with specific student groups.

Effects of Expert System Consultation within Curriculum-Based Measurement, Using a Reading Maze Task

This study assessed the effects of expert system instructional consultation within curriculum-based measurement (CBM). Thirty-three special educators and 63 students with mild to moderate

Examining the Validity of Two Measures for Formative Teaching: Reading Aloud and Maze

This study examined the relations among performance on standardized reading tests, two informal measures (reading aloud and maze), and teacher judgment. Subjects were 335 students from Grades 2–6.

An Analysis of Spelling Curricula and Teachers' Skills in Identifying Error Types

Analysis of variance indicated that ongoing feedback regarding types of student errors enhanced teachers' correct identification of phonetic spelling errors, a skill considered necessary in designing effective spelling instructional programs.

Identifying Valid Measures of Reading

Correlational analyses for five formative measures and three standardized measures provided evidence for the validity of Words in Isolation, Words in Context, and Oral Reading as indices of reading achievement.