Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?.

@article{Fuchs1993FormativeEO,
  title={Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?.},
  author={L. Fuchs},
  journal={School Psychology Review},
  year={1993},
  volume={22},
  pages={27-48}
}
  • L. Fuchs
  • Published 1993
  • Psychology
  • School Psychology Review
  • The purpose of this study was to examine students' weekly rates of academic growth, or slopes of achievement, when Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) is conducted repeatedly over 1 year. Using standard CBM procedures in reading, spelling, or math, students in Year 1 (n = 546) were measured once each week; students in Year 2 (n = 2,511) were measured at least monthly. Results provided corroborating data across years and interesting patterns for different types of measures. Findings are discussed… CONTINUE READING
    438 Citations

    Tables from this paper

    Curriculum-Based Measurement and Standards-Based Mathematics
    • 16
    The Applicability of Curriculum-Based Measurement to Measure Reading in Hebrew
    • 4
    • Highly Influenced

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
    Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative
    • S. Deno
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Exceptional children
    • 1985
    • 1,485
    • Highly Influential
    Effects of Alternative Goal Structures within Curriculum-Based Measurement
    • 114
    Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children
    • 807
    Examining the Validity of Two Measures for Formative Teaching: Reading Aloud and Maze
    • 230