• Corpus ID: 69473981

Formalization of Logic in the Isabelle Proof Assistant

@inproceedings{Schlichtkrull2018FormalizationOL,
  title={Formalization of Logic in the Isabelle Proof Assistant},
  author={Anders Schlichtkrull},
  year={2018}
}
Isabelle is a proof assistant, i.e. a computer program that helps its user to define concepts in mathematics and computer science as well as to prove properties about them. This process is called formalization. Proof assistants aid their users by ensuring that proofs are constructed correctly and by conducting parts of the proofs automatically. A logical calculus is a set of rules and axioms that can be applied to construct theorems of the calculus. Logical calculi are employed in e.g. tools… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

New Formalized Results on the Meta-Theory of a Paraconsistent Logic

TLDR
This paper presents the meta-theory of a paraconsistent infinite-valued Logic, in particular new results showing that while the question of validity for a given formula can be reduced to a consideration of only finitely many truth values, this does not mean that the logic collapses to a finite-valued logic.

A verified prover based on ordered resolution

TLDR
This work specifies, using Isabelle/HOL, a purely functional first-order ordered resolution prover and establishes its soundness and refutational completeness, and applies stepwise refinement to obtain, from an abstract nondeterministic specification, a verified deterministic program.

A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of the continuum hypothesis

We describe a formalization of forcing using Boolean-valued models in the Lean 3 theorem prover, including the fundamental theorem of forcing and a deep embedding of first-order logic with a

A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis

We describe a formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis (CH) in the Lean theorem prover. We use Boolean-valued models to give forcing arguments for both directions, using Cohen

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 205 REFERENCES

Concrete Semantics: With Isabelle/HOL

TLDR
The book teaches the reader the art of precise logical reasoning and the practical use of a proof assistant as a surgical tool for formal proofs about computer science artefacts.

Formalization of the Resolution Calculus for First-Order Logic

TLDR
A formalization in Isabelle/HOL of the resolution calculus for first-order logic with formal soundness and completeness proofs and a thorough overview of formalizations of first- order logic found in the literature is given.

Programming and verifying a declarative first-order prover in Isabelle/HOL

TLDR
This work certifies in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL the soundness of a declarative first-order prover with equality and shows examples of proofs and how they are made in the prover.

The Resolution Calculus for First-Order Logic

TLDR
This theory is a formalization of the resolution calculus for firstorder logic which employs Herbrand’s theorem in a formulation which states that an unsatisfiable set of clauses has a finite closed semantic tree and is proven sound and complete.

Constructive Completeness Proofs and Delimited Control

Motivated by facilitating reasoning with logical meta-theory inside the Coq proof assistant, we investigate the constructive versions of some completeness theorems. We start by analysing the proofs

Reasoning about terminating functional programs

TLDR
This thesis builds a pattern-matching style recursive function definition facility, based on mechanically proven wellfounded recursion and induction theorems, and shows that the sophisticated algorithms implemented in TFL can be parameterized by higher order logic proof system.

Automatic Generation of Proof Tactics for Finite-Valued Logics

TLDR
The present contribution discusses the implementation of an algorithm that generates sound and complete tableau systems for a very inclusive class of sufficedly expressive finite-valued propositional logics, and illustrates some of the challenges related to the algorithmic formation of automated theorem proving tactics for such logics.

Isar - A Generic Interpretative Approach to Readable Formal Proof Documents

TLDR
Isar's main aspect is its formal language for natural deduction proofs, which sets out to bridge the semantic gap between internal notions of proof given by state-of-the-art interactive theorem proving systems and an appropriate level of abstraction for user-level work.

A Verified Simple Prover for First-Order Logic

We present a simple prover for first-order logic with certified soundness and completeness in Isabelle/HOL, taking formalizations by Tom Ridge and others as the starting point, but with the aim of

Certification of Termination Proofs Using CeTA

TLDR
This paper uses the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL to automatically certify termination proofs and formalized the required theory of term rewriting including three major termination criteria: dependency pairs, dependency graphs, and reduction pairs.
...