Forensic “Lie Detection”

@article{Iacono2001ForensicD,
  title={Forensic “Lie Detection”},
  author={William G. Iacono},
  journal={Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice},
  year={2001},
  volume={1},
  pages={75 - 86}
}
  • W. Iacono
  • Published 1 January 2001
  • Psychology
  • Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice
Abstract This paper provides a critical overview of the scientific status of the control question test (CQT), the type of polygraph test most likely to be used in forensic settings. The CQT is based on an implausible set of assumptions that makes it biased against innocent individuals and easy for guilty persons to defeat using countermea-sures. Due to serious methodological problems that characterize research on CQT validity, it is not possible to use the existing literature to provide a… 
Credibility assessment: preliminary process theory, the polygraph process, and construct validity.
  • John J Palmatier, L. Rovner
  • Psychology
    International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
  • 2015
How good are we at detecting deception? A review of current techniques and theories
The task of discerning truth from untruth has long interested psychologists; however, methods for doing so accurately remain elusive. In this article, we provide an overview and evaluation of methods
fMRI Lie Detection Validity and Admissibility as Evidence in Court and Applicability of the Court’s Ruling to Polygraph Testing
On 18 June 2008, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against Dr. Lorne Allan Semrau, a clinical psychologist, and in a Second Superseding Indictment fi led later that year charged him with
The Court of Public Opinion: Lay Perceptions of Polygraph Testing
TLDR
Similar to previous studies on the impact of polygraph evidence on jurors’ guilt judgments, this sample of jury-eligible adults indicated that they did not find polygraph test evidence to be persuasive.
The (F)utility of Post-Conviction Polygraph Testing
  • J. Rosky
  • Law
    Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment
  • 2013
TLDR
It is demonstrated that although post-conviction polygraph testing may have some utility by increasing disclosures of prior offending and, within specific cases, admissions of treatment and supervision violations, the limited evidence accumulated thus far does not adequately ascertain its accuracy nor support its efficacy or effectiveness as a deterrent.
Application of the Polygraph Examination in the Assessment and Treatment of Internet Sex Offenders
Abstract Mental health and criminal justice professionals have been faced with the emergence of a new category of sex offender who utilizes the Internet to initiate or commit deviant sexual acts.
Post-conviction Sex Offender Polygraph Examination: Client-Reported Perceptions of Utility and Accuracy
TLDR
This study explored how sexual offenders enrolled in outpatient treatment programs perceived their polygraph experience, finding a relatively low incidence of false indications of both deception and truthfulness, suggesting that clients agreed with examiners’ opinions 90% of the time.
Sex Offender Polygraph Examination: An Evidence-Based Case Management Tool for Social Workers
  • J. Levenson
  • Psychology
    Journal of evidence-based social work
  • 2009
TLDR
An emerging body of evidence supporting the utility of polygraph testing with sex offenders will be discussed and ways that social workers can incorporate this knowledge into their case management and clinical roles will be offered.
An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 12 REFERENCES
The validity of the lie detector : Two surveys of scientific opinion
The widespread use of polygraph (lie detector) tests has important social and individual consequences. Courts asked to admit polygraph findings into evidence, as well as individuals asked to submit
Validity of the Control Question Polygraph Test: The Problem of Sampling Bias
Sampling bias is a potential problem in polygraph validity studies in which posttest confessions are used to establish ground truth because this criterion is not independent of the polygraph test. In
A field study of the fallibility of polygraphic lie detection
TLDR
The validity and reliability of polygraphic interrogation has yet to be established, as in the previous study, and findings show high false-positive and false-negative rates among polygraph interpreters.
Detection of Deception: Polygraph and Integrity Tests
The recent Ames spy case, in which a high-level CIA official is accused of spying for the Soviet Union, and then Russia, for more than 10 years, highlights the societal importance of detecting
Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective
1. History and Description.- 2. A Critical Comparison of the Major Methods of Polygraph Interrogation.- 3. Reliability and Validity of Polygraph-Based Classifications.- 4. Laboratory Studies: Factors
The role of comparison questions in physiological detection of deception.
TLDR
Comparison questions in physiological detection of deception were studied with 60 "guilty" and 60 "innocent" participants in a mock crime experiment and produced different patterns of physiological responses for innocent but not for guilty participants.
Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of polygraph tests.
TLDR
Effects of countermeasures on the control-question polygraph test were examined in an experiment with 120 Ss recruited from the general community and found that the countermeasures were difficult to detect either instrumentally or through observation.
...
...