• DOI:10.1007/s10618-022-00894-5
• Corpus ID: 247594079

Forecast evaluation for data scientists: common pitfalls and best practices

@article{Hewamalage2022ForecastEF,
  title={Forecast evaluation for data scientists: common pitfalls and best practices},
  author={Hansika Hewamalage and Klaus Ackermann and C. Bergmeir},
  journal={Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery},
  year={2022},
  volume={37},
  pages={788 - 832}
}

• Hansika Hewamalage, Klaus Ackermann, C. Bergmeir
• Published 21 March 2022
• Computer Science
• Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery

Recent trends in the Machine Learning (ML) and in particular Deep Learning (DL) domains have demonstrated that with the availability of massive amounts of time series, ML and DL techniques are competitive in time series forecasting. Nevertheless, the different forms of non-stationarities associated with time series challenge the capabilities of data-driven ML models. Furthermore, due to the domain of forecasting being fostered mainly by statisticians and econometricians over the years, the concepts related to forecast evaluation are not the mainstream knowledge among ML researchers. We demonstrate in our work that as a consequence, ML researchers oftentimes adopt flawed evaluation practices which results in spurious conclusions suggesting methods that are not competitive in reality to be seemingly competitive. Therefore, in this work we provide a tutorial-like compilation of the details associated with forecast evaluation. This way, we intend to impart the information associated with forecast evaluation to fit the context of ML, as means of bridging the knowledge gap between traditional methods of forecasting and adopting current state-of-the-art ML techniques.We elaborate the details of the different problematic characteristics of time series such as non-normality and non-stationarities and how they are associated with common pitfalls in forecast evaluation. Best practices in forecast evaluation are outlined with respect to the different steps such as data partitioning, error calculation, statistical testing, and others. Further guidelines are also provided along selecting valid and suitable error measures depending on the specific characteristics of the dataset at hand.