Force Signs: Ideologies of Corporal Discipline in Academia and the Marshall Islands

@article{Berman2018ForceSI,
  title={Force Signs: Ideologies of Corporal Discipline in Academia and the Marshall Islands},
  author={E. Berman},
  journal={Journal of Linguistic Anthropology},
  year={2018},
  volume={28},
  pages={22-42}
}
  • E. Berman
  • Published 2018
  • Psychology
  • Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
    • Corporal discipline is often called the most frequent form of violence against children. This conclusion comes from an extensive body of research that supposedly shows that corporal discipline is both harmful and pervasive. But this research is biased by three ideologies of language and signs—or semiotic ideologies—that distort the collection and interpretation of data: assumptions that speech functions mainly to refer; views of signs and the physical world as distinct; and interpretations of… CONTINUE READING
    View via Publisher
    pages.uncc.edu
    2 Citations
    Background Citations
    1

    Figures from this paper

    Figures

    2 Citations
    Citation Type

    Citation Type

    Trading Options and the Unattainable Dream: Some Reflections on Semiotic Ideologies
    Talking “like a race”: Gender, authority, and articulate speech in African American students’ marking speech acts