Foraging Costs and Relative Prey Size

@article{Griffiths1980ForagingCA,
  title={Foraging Costs and Relative Prey Size},
  author={D. Griffiths},
  journal={The American Naturalist},
  year={1980},
  volume={116},
  pages={743 - 752}
}
  • D. Griffiths
  • Published 1980
  • Biology
  • The American Naturalist
  • The optimization approach to foraging is, by definition, concerned with the benefits and costs associated with feeding. The benefits to a predator are relatively easy to determine; they can, for example, be measured in terms of the weight or energy content of the food received. Measurement of costs however, has proven more difficult. Recently Werner and Hall (1974), followed by Kislalioglu and Gibson (1976), Stein (1977), and Elmer and Hughes (1978), have estimated costs as the time spent… CONTINUE READING
    124 Citations
    Foraging mode switching: the importance of prey distribution and foraging currency
    • 21
    Testing competing measures of profitability for mobile resources
    • 37
    Constraints on active-consumption rates in gray wolves, coyotes, and grizzly bears
    • 24
    • PDF
    Search Strategies of Foraging Animals
    • 61
    Colony size, habitat structure, and prey size shape the predation ecology of a social pseudoscorpion from a tropical savanna
    • 5
    • PDF
    The Diet and Foraging Strategy of Varanus acanthurus
    • 2008
    • 3
    • PDF
    Unsuccessful Predation and Evolution
    • 347
    Foraging habitat determines predator-prey size relationships in marine fishes.

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES