Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

@article{Schwingshackl2017FoodGA,
  title={Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies},
  author={L. Schwingshackl and G. Hoffmann and Anna-Maria Lampousi and S. Kn{\"u}ppel and K. Iqbal and C. Schwedhelm and A. Bechthold and S. Schlesinger and H. Boeing},
  journal={European Journal of Epidemiology},
  year={2017},
  volume={32},
  pages={363 - 375}
}
  • L. Schwingshackl, G. Hoffmann, +6 authors H. Boeing
  • Published 2017
  • Medicine
  • European Journal of Epidemiology
  • The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the knowledge about the relation between intake of 12 major food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar for prospective studies investigating the association between whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat, and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) on risk… CONTINUE READING
    203 Citations
    Food Groups and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
    • 83
    • PDF
    Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer
    • 76
    Food groups and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies
    • 158

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 60 REFERENCES
    Food groups and risk of chronic disease: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of cohort studies
    • 13
    Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis.
    • A. Pan, Qi Sun, +4 authors F. Hu
    • Medicine
    • The American journal of clinical nutrition
    • 2011
    • 352
    • PDF
    Is there a relationship between red or processed meat intake and obesity? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies
    • 118