Food Industry Funding of Nutrition Research: The Relevance of History for Current Debates.

@article{Nestle2016FoodIF,
  title={Food Industry Funding of Nutrition Research: The Relevance of History for Current Debates.},
  author={M. Nestle},
  journal={JAMA internal medicine},
  year={2016},
  volume={176 11},
  pages={
          1685-1686
        }
}
  • M. Nestle
  • Published 2016
  • Medicine
  • JAMA internal medicine
  • Industry-sponsored nutrition research, like that of research sponsored by the tobacco, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries, almost invariably produces results that confirm the benefits or lack of harm of the sponsor’s products, even when independently sponsored research comes to opposite conclusions.1 Although considerable evidence demonstrates that those industries deliberately influenced the design, results, and interpretation of the studies they paid for,2 much less is known about the… CONTINUE READING
    33 Citations
    Source of bias in sugar-sweetened beverage research: a systematic review.
    • 11
    • PDF
    Sugar Industry Science and Heart Disease
    • 1
    Was there ever really a “sugar conspiracy”?
    • 18
    Evidence-Based Policymaking in the Food–Health Nexus
    • PDF
    How Coca-Cola Shaped the International Congress on Physical Activity and Public Health: An Analysis of Email Exchanges between 2012 and 2014
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
    Corporate Funding of Food and Nutrition Research: Science or Marketing?
    • 61
    • PDF
    Dietary fats, carbohydrates and atherosclerotic vascular disease.
    • 98
    Exclusive: how candy makers shape nutrition science
    • Associated Press. The Big Story, June
    • 2016
    Coca-Cola funds scientists who shift blame for obesity away from bad diets
    • New York Times. August
    • 2015
    Nutritionism: the science and politics of dietary advice
    • 48
    • PDF
    Adventures in nutrition
    • 5