Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.

  title={Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.},
  author={Timothy D. Wilson and Thalia Wheatley and J M Meyers and Daniel T. Gilbert and Danny K. Axsom},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  volume={78 5},
The durability bias, the tendency to overpredict the duration of affective reactions to future events, may be due in part to focalism, whereby people focus too much on the event in question and not enough on the consequences of other future events. If so, asking people to think about other future activities should reduce the durability bias. In Studies 1-3, college football fans were less likely to overpredict how long the outcome of a football game would influence their happiness if they first… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Cultural Differences in Affective Forecasting: The Role of Focalism
Three studies supported the hypothesis that East Asians, who tend to think more holistically than Westerners, would be less susceptible to focalism and, consequently, to the impact bias in affective forecasting.
Intensity Bias in Affective Forecasting: The Role of Temporal Focus
In five studies, university students predicted their affective reactions to a wide variety of positive and negative future events. In Studies 1 to 3, participants also reported the affective
Focalism and the underestimation of future emotion: when it's worse than imagined.
Failing to account for the extent to which context would focus attention on the event led to underestimation of emotional reactions to a negative event.
Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors.
Examination of individual differences and contextual variables associated with cognitive processing in affective forecasting for an election showed that the perceived importance of the event and working memory capacity were both associated with an increased impact bias for some participants, whereas retrieval interference had no relationship with bias.
Predicting future affective states: How ease of retrieval and faith in intuition moderate the impact of activated content
Prior research suggests that duration bias—the tendency to overestimate the duration of affective states—is due to individuals' inordinate focus on event-related information. We propose that the
Accuracy and artifact: reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting.
The results showed that participants accurately predicted the intensity of their feelings about events and revealed that people have more sophisticated self-knowledge than is commonly portrayed in the affective forecasting literature.
Affective Forecasting
People base many decisions on affective forecasts, predictions about their emotional reactions to future events. They often display an impact bias, overestimating the intensity and duration of their
Motivated underpinnings of the impact bias in affective forecasts.
The results of four experiments suggest that affective forecasters may strategically overestimate the hedonic impact of events to motivate their production, providing the first support for this hypothesis.
When and Why People Misestimate Future Feelings: Identifying Strengths and Weaknesses in Affective Forecasting
This investigation tested a model of affective forecasting that captures this variability in bias by differentiating emotional intensity, emotional frequency, and mood and found that participants were more accurate in forecasting the intensity of their emotion and less accurate in forecasts emotion frequency and mood.


Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.
The present experiments suggest that people neglect the psychological immune system when making affective forecasts.
Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence.
Data is presented indicating that results stem from a tendency for people to feel more "accountable" for their assessments, and thus focus less on the causes of success and more on the cause of failure, as the time to perform approaches.
The Role of Motivated Reasoning in Optimistic Time Predictions
The authors explore the well-documented tendency for people to predict that they will finish tasks earlier than they actually do. Whereas previous research has tied this optimistic bias to the
Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function
Subjective Construal, Social Inference, and Human Misunderstanding
Temporal Adjustments in the Evaluation of Events: The "Rosy View"
The results of all three studies supported the hypothesis that people's expectations of personal events are more positive than their actual experience during the event itself, and their subsequent recollection of that event is morepositive than the actual experience.
Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment.
A review of studies using experimental manipulations indicates that people who explain or imagine a possibility then express greater confidence in the truth of that possibility, and this effect results from the approach people take in the explanation or imagination task.
Exploring the "planning fallacy": Why people underestimate their task completion times.
This study tested 3 main hypotheses concerning people's predictions of task completion times: (a) People underestimate their own but not others' completion times, (b) people focus on plan-based
Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative?
Lottery winners were not happier than controls and took significantly less pleasure from a series of mundane events, and Paraplegics also demonstrated a contrast effect, not by enhancing minor pleasures but by idealizing their past, which did not help their present happiness.
Data analysis in social psychology.