Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: a randomized controlled trial.
@article{Lainas2008FlexibleGA,
title={Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: a randomized controlled trial.},
author={Trifon G. Lainas and Ioannis A Sfontouris and Evangelos G.E. Papanikolaou and John Z Zorzovilis and George K. Petsas and George T. Lainas and Efstratios M. Kolibianakis},
journal={Human reproduction},
year={2008},
volume={23 6},
pages={
1355-8
}
}BACKGROUND
Although initial studies in poor responders using GnRH antagonists have reported encouraging results, they are limited in number, only a few of them are prospective, while the majority is characterized by limited power to detect a clinically important difference.
[] Key MethodMETHODS
A randomized controlled trial was performed in patients with one or more previous failed IVF cycles in which five or less oocytes were retrieved, using > or =300 IU of gonadotrophins/day.
66 Citations
Meta-analysis of GnRH-antagonists versus GnRH-agonists in poor responder protocols
- BiologyArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- 2021
Based on the present meta-analysis, agonist protocols could be suggested as a first choice approach, in terms of effectiveness, in poor responders, using Medcalc 16.8 version software.
Long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus short agonist versus antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial.
- Medicine, BiologyFertility and sterility
- 2014
A prospective randomised study comparing a GnRH-antagonist versus a GnRH-agonist short protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients referred for IVF
- Medicine, BiologyFacts, views & vision in ObGyn
- 2012
Poor prognosis for ovarian response to stimulation: results of a randomised trial comparing the flare-up GnRH agonist protocol vs. the antagonist protocol
- Medicine, BiologyGynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology
- 2010
In patients with poor prognosis for ovarian response, the flare-up agonist and the antagonist protocols were comparable regarding clinical pregnancy rates, and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two protocols.
Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
- Medicine, BiologyInternational journal of fertility & sterility
- 2013
There is no significant difference between these protocols for improving the ART outcome in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation, and additional prospective, randomized studies with more patients is necessary to determine the best protocol.
IVF Outcomes of Microdose Flare-up, GnRH Antagonist, and Long Protocols in Patients having a Poor Ovarian Response in the First Treatment Cycle.
- Medicine, BiologyJournal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP
- 2021
Ovarian reserve markers are essential factors with stimulation protocol for the success of IVF in poor responder patients and long protocol may be an option in poor responders undergoing IVF.
A Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist versus a Microdose Flare-Up GnRH Agonist Combined with a Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders to IVF
- Medicine, BiologyBioMed research international
- 2015
The combination protocol does not provide additional efficacy in poor responders to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and there were no statistically significant differences in the hCG positivity or the clinical pregnancy rates.
Comparison of different stimulation protocols efficacy in poor responders undergoing IVF: A retrospective study
- Biology, MedicineGynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology
- 2012
The present study suggests that the application of four different protocols in poor respond patients seem to have similar efficacy in improving clinical outcomes such as implantation, pregnancy rates and cancellation rate even though GnRH-a long protocol yielded more retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes compared to Gn RH-a miniflare protocol.
Comparison of mild and microdose GnRH agonist flare protocols on IVF outcome in poor responders
- Biology, MedicineArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- 2010
Although the cancellation, fertilization, and clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both groups, the endometrial thickness, number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and implantation rate were significantly higher in mild protocol.
IVF Outcomes of Microdose Flare-up, GnRH Antagonist and Long Protocols in Patients Having a Poor Ovarian Response in the First Treatment Cycle
- Medicine, Biology
- 2021
Objectives: To compare the outcome of patients assumed to be poor responders before their first cycle of IVF and treated either microdose flare-up or GnRH antagonist protocols with patients…
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
In a flexible antagonist protocol, earlier, criteria-based initiation of GnRH antagonist is associated with increased pregnancy rates in IVF.
- MedicineHuman reproduction
- 2005
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the study was to assess ongoing pregnancy rates across groups of patients treated by IVF, which were defined according to criteria aimed at the prevention of premature LH…
Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: results of a prospective randomized trial.
- Medicine, BiologyHuman reproduction
- 2001
The impact of these two regimens in ovarian stimulation of poor responders seem to be same and to establish these results further randomized studies with larger sample sizes are required.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist plus recombinant luteinizing hormone vs. a standard GnRH agonist short protocol in patients at risk for poor ovarian response.
- Biology, MedicineFertility and sterility
- 2006
GnRH-antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with poor response to gonadotrophins, polycystic ovary syndrome, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis.
- Biology, MedicineReproductive biomedicine online
- 2006
Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review.
- Medicine, BiologyHuman reproduction update
- 2003
Several protocols have been proposed for clinical management of low ovarian response in IVF and natural cycle IVF has produced results which are comparable with those obtained with stimulated cycles in true poor responders.
Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation.
- Medicine, BiologyFertility and sterility
- 2005
Agonist "flare-up" versus antagonist in the management of poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment.
- MedicineFertility and sterility
- 2005
A randomized prospective study of microdose leuprolide versus ganirelix in in vitro fertilization cycles for poor responders.
- Medicine, BiologyFertility and sterility
- 2005
High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome.
- MedicineFertility and sterility
- 1996
Fertility prognosis in IVF treatment of patients with cancelled cycles.
- Medicine, BiologyHuman reproduction
- 1989
It is concluded that cancelling of a cycle because of a low E2 response in a patient with tubal infertility is indicative of a poor prognosis in further IVF trials.


