Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: a randomized controlled trial.

@article{Lainas2008FlexibleGA,
  title={Flexible GnRH antagonist versus flare-up GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders treated by IVF: a randomized controlled trial.},
  author={Trifon G. Lainas and Ioannis A Sfontouris and Evangelos G.E. Papanikolaou and John Z Zorzovilis and George K. Petsas and George T. Lainas and Efstratios M. Kolibianakis},
  journal={Human reproduction},
  year={2008},
  volume={23 6},
  pages={
          1355-8
        }
}
BACKGROUND Although initial studies in poor responders using GnRH antagonists have reported encouraging results, they are limited in number, only a few of them are prospective, while the majority is characterized by limited power to detect a clinically important difference. [] Key MethodMETHODS A randomized controlled trial was performed in patients with one or more previous failed IVF cycles in which five or less oocytes were retrieved, using > or =300 IU of gonadotrophins/day.
Meta-analysis of GnRH-antagonists versus GnRH-agonists in poor responder protocols
TLDR
Based on the present meta-analysis, agonist protocols could be suggested as a first choice approach, in terms of effectiveness, in poor responders, using Medcalc 16.8 version software.
Poor prognosis for ovarian response to stimulation: results of a randomised trial comparing the flare-up GnRH agonist protocol vs. the antagonist protocol
  • M. Devesa, F. Martínez, +4 authors P. Barri
  • Medicine, Biology
    Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology
  • 2010
TLDR
In patients with poor prognosis for ovarian response, the flare-up agonist and the antagonist protocols were comparable regarding clinical pregnancy rates, and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two protocols.
Microdose GnRH Agonist Flare-Up versus Ultrashort GnRH Agonist Combined with Fixed GnRH Antagonist in Poor Responders of Assisted Reproductive Techniques Cycles
TLDR
There is no significant difference between these protocols for improving the ART outcome in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation, and additional prospective, randomized studies with more patients is necessary to determine the best protocol.
IVF Outcomes of Microdose Flare-up, GnRH Antagonist, and Long Protocols in Patients having a Poor Ovarian Response in the First Treatment Cycle.
TLDR
Ovarian reserve markers are essential factors with stimulation protocol for the success of IVF in poor responder patients and long protocol may be an option in poor responders undergoing IVF.
A Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist versus a Microdose Flare-Up GnRH Agonist Combined with a Flexible Multidose GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Poor Responders to IVF
TLDR
The combination protocol does not provide additional efficacy in poor responders to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and there were no statistically significant differences in the hCG positivity or the clinical pregnancy rates.
Comparison of different stimulation protocols efficacy in poor responders undergoing IVF: A retrospective study
  • T. Madani, M. Ashrafi, L. Yeganeh
  • Biology, Medicine
    Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology
  • 2012
TLDR
The present study suggests that the application of four different protocols in poor respond patients seem to have similar efficacy in improving clinical outcomes such as implantation, pregnancy rates and cancellation rate even though GnRH-a long protocol yielded more retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes compared to Gn RH-a miniflare protocol.
Comparison of mild and microdose GnRH agonist flare protocols on IVF outcome in poor responders
TLDR
Although the cancellation, fertilization, and clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both groups, the endometrial thickness, number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and implantation rate were significantly higher in mild protocol.
IVF Outcomes of Microdose Flare-up, GnRH Antagonist and Long Protocols in Patients Having a Poor Ovarian Response in the First Treatment Cycle
Objectives: To compare the outcome of patients assumed to be poor responders before their first cycle of IVF and treated either microdose flare-up or GnRH antagonist protocols with patients
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
In a flexible antagonist protocol, earlier, criteria-based initiation of GnRH antagonist is associated with increased pregnancy rates in IVF.
BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to assess ongoing pregnancy rates across groups of patients treated by IVF, which were defined according to criteria aimed at the prevention of premature LH
Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: results of a prospective randomized trial.
TLDR
The impact of these two regimens in ovarian stimulation of poor responders seem to be same and to establish these results further randomized studies with larger sample sizes are required.
Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review.
TLDR
Several protocols have been proposed for clinical management of low ovarian response in IVF and natural cycle IVF has produced results which are comparable with those obtained with stimulated cycles in true poor responders.
Fertility prognosis in IVF treatment of patients with cancelled cycles.
TLDR
It is concluded that cancelling of a cycle because of a low E2 response in a patient with tubal infertility is indicative of a poor prognosis in further IVF trials.
...
1
2
3
...