• DOI:10.1145/3503222.3507759
• Corpus ID: 245123994

FlexOS: towards flexible OS isolation

@article{Lefeuvre2021FlexOSTF,
  title={FlexOS: towards flexible OS isolation},
  author={Hugo Lefeuvre and Vlad-Andrei Badoiu and Alexander Jung and Stefan Teodorescu and Sebastian Rauch and Felipe Huici and Costin Raiciu and Pierre Olivier},
  journal={Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems},
  year={2021}
}

• Hugo Lefeuvre, Vlad-Andrei Badoiu, +5 authors Pierre Olivier
• Published 13 December 2021
• Computer Science
• Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems

At design time, modern operating systems are locked in a specific safety and isolation strategy that mixes one or more hardware/software protection mechanisms (e.g. user/kernel separation); revisiting these choices after deployment requires a major refactoring effort. This rigid approach shows its limits given the wide variety of modern applications' safety/performance requirements, when new hardware isolation mechanisms are rolled out, or when existing ones break. We present FlexOS, a novel OS allowing users to easily specialize the safety and isolation strategy of an OS at compilation/deployment time instead of design time. This modular LibOS is composed of fine-grained components that can be isolated via a range of hardware protection mechanisms with various data sharing strategies and additional software hardening. The OS ships with an exploration technique helping the user navigate the vast safety/performance design space it unlocks. We implement a prototype of the system and demonstrate, for several applications (Redis/Nginx/SQLite), FlexOS' vast configuration space as well as the efficiency of the exploration technique: we evaluate 80 FlexOS configurations for Redis and show how that space can be probabilistically subset to the 5 safest ones under a given performance budget. We also show that, under equivalent configurations, FlexOS performs similarly or better than existing solutions which use fixed safety configurations.