Five seconds or sixty? Presentation time in expert memory

@article{Gobet2000FiveSO,
  title={Five seconds or sixty? Presentation time in expert memory},
  author={Fernand R. Gobet and Herbert A. Simon},
  journal={Cogn. Sci.},
  year={2000},
  volume={24},
  pages={651-682}
}
For many years, the game of chess has provided an invaluable task environment for research on cognition, in particular on the differences between novices and experts and the learning that removes these differences, and upon the structure of human memory and its paramaters. The template theory presented by Gobet and Simon based on the EPAM theory offers precise predictions on cognitive processes during the presentation and recall of chess positions. This article describes the behavior of CHREST… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Chunks in expert memory: Evidence for the magical number four … or is it two?

TLDR
The results suggest that the original chunking theory overestimated short-term memory capacity and underestimated the size of chunks used, in particular with Masters, and suggest that Cowan's proposal that STM holds four chunks may be an overestimate.

In search of templates

Long-term working memory: A computational implementation for chess expertise

TLDR
Simulations of Saariluoma’s (1989) experiment where both game and random chess positions are presented auditorily make it possible to analyse two key ingredients of the theory: encoding through elaboration of LTM schemas and patterns, and encoding through retrieval structures.

Memory for the Random: A Simulation of Computer Program Recall

TLDR
Results show that a simplified version of CHREST (without the learning and use of highlevel schemata known as templates) broadly captures the skill effect with scrambled programs, but it fails to account for the differences found in humans between different types of randomisation.

Measuring Chess Experts' Single-Use Sequence Knowledge: An Archival Study of Departure from ‘Theoretical’ Openings

TLDR
The results support the hypothesis that monochrestic knowledge is essential for reaching high levels of expertise in chess and provide a direct, quantitative estimate of the number of opening moves that players have to know to reach master level.

Chunks and Templates in Semantic Long-term Memory: The Importance of Specialization

TLDR
This chapter describes a 2-year study that followed the improvement of a chess master trained to memorize as many chess positions as possible, each presented for 8 seconds, and shows a clear effect of specialization.

Chess knowledge predicts chess memory even after controlling for chess experience: Evidence for the role of high-level processes

TLDR
The results of this experiment support the conclusion that both high-level conceptual processing and low-level recognition of familiar patterns play important roles in memory for chess positions.

The role of constraints in expert memory.

  • F. GobetA. Waters
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2003
TLDR
There was a significant skill effect in a condition in which both the location and distribution of the pieces were randomized, suggesting that process models such as TT can provide a viable account of expert memory in chess.

Computational Modelling of Mental Imagery in Chess: A Sensitivity Analysis

TLDR
The sensitivity analysis presented in the current paper shows that the fit was nearly optimal for all groups of players except the grandmaster group for which, counterintuitively, a slower shifting time gave a better fit.

Mental imagery and chunks: Empirical and computational findings

TLDR
To investigate experts’ imagery in chess, players were required to recall briefly presented positions in which pieces were placed on the intersections between squares (intersection positions), which reinforces the plausibility of CHREST as a model of cognition.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 84 REFERENCES

Recall of random and distorted chess positions: Implications for the theory of expertise

This paper explores the question, important to the theory of expert performance, of the nature and number of chunks that chess experts hold in memory. It examines how memory contents determine

A computer model of chess memory

TLDR
This paper presents a model which shares several common concepts with an earlier attempt, but features several new attributes: dynamic short-term memory, recursive chunking, more sophisticated perceptual mechanisms and use of a retrieval structure.

Recall memory for visually presented chess positions

TLDR
A series of three experiments replicated and extended earlier research reported by Chase and Simon (1973), de Groot (1965), and Charness (1965) and demonstrated that meaningful piece groupings during presentation markedly enhance subsequent recall performance.

Expert memory: a comparison of four theories

Expert chess memory: revisiting the chunking hypothesis.

TLDR
It is concluded that the two-second inter-chunk interval used to define chunk boundaries is robust, and that chunks have psychological reality.

The generality of the levels of processing hypothesis: An application to memory for chess positions

The generality of the levels of processing approach to memory was tested by using chess positions rather than words as stimuli. Experiment 1 compared recall following semantic orienting instructions

Chess players' recall of auditorily presented chess positions

Abstract Chess players' recall of auditorily presented chess positions were studied in three experiments. The results of the first two experiments showed that the skilled chess players are better at

Perception in chess

Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill

TLDR
It is shown that strong players generally maintain some superiority over weak players even with random positions, although the relative difference between skill levels is much smaller than with game positions.

Simulation of expert memory using EPAM IV.

TLDR
EPAM IV reproduces all of the phenomena explained previously by EPAM III and in addition gives an accurate detailed account of the performance of an expert recalling long sequences of digits.
...