Five Factor Model Personality Traits, Jury Selection, and Case Outcomes in Criminal and Civil Cases

@article{Clark2007FiveFM,
  title={Five Factor Model Personality Traits, Jury Selection, and Case Outcomes in Criminal and Civil Cases},
  author={John W. Clark and Marcus T. Boccaccini and Beth A. Caillouet and William Chaplin},
  journal={Criminal Justice and Behavior},
  year={2007},
  volume={34},
  pages={641 - 660}
}
Actual venire members ( N = 764) completed the Big Five Inventory before going through the jury selection process for 1 of 11 criminal or 17 civil trials. Jury selection decisions by attorneys were not associated with juror personality traits but were associated with juror race and sex, especially in criminal cases. In the 17 juries that deliberated to a verdict (n = 285), high levels of juror extraversion were associated with not guilty verdicts or verdicts for the defendant, especially in… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Jury Process: Racial Bias, Extraversion, Leadership, & Sex

This study explored the interactions between individuals’ attitudes and group dynamics during the jury deliberation process. More specifically, whether implicit racial bias are correlated with

The relationship between political ideology and punishment: What do jury panel members say?

This study examines the effect of the self-identified political ideology of jurors and the tendency of those jurors to assess punishment. Significant research has been conducted that suggests an

Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Jury Decision Making

This article reviews a growing body of social science research indicating that race, ethnicity, and culture can influence the judgments and behaviors of juries. The first section addresses research

Direct and Indirect Influences of Defendant Mental Illness on Jury Decision Making

Results revealed that defendants with schizophrenia were sentenced in a more lenient manner than defendants with no mental illness, however, several additional findings indicated an indirect negative attitude toward the mentally ill defendant.

The potential effect of neurobiological evidence on the adjudication of criminal responsibility of psychopathic defendants in involuntary manslaughter cases

ABSTRACT Research on how neurobiological evidence influences jurors’ decision-making in adjudications of criminal responsibility is growing. Mock trial studies on this topic have almost entirely

Doing Justice: Perceptions of Gender Neutrality in the Jury Selection Process

There is a paucity of research on juries in general including the jury selection process. Very little of it examines the effect of gender. This study surveyed 138 potential jurors to determine

Doing Justice: Perceptions of Gender Neutrality in the Jury Selection Process

There is a paucity of research on juries in general including the jury selection process. Very little of it examines the effect of gender. This study surveyed 138 potential jurors to determine

Psychological Theories of Juvenile Delinquency – A Criminological Perspective

: The second branch of trait theories focuses on the psychological aspects of crime, including the association among intelligence, personality, learning, and criminal behaviour. Psychological

Effects of Mental Health and Neuroscience Evidence on Juror Perceptions of a Criminal Defendant: the Moderating Role of Political Orientation.

Juror perceptions of the defendant's level of psychopathic traits predicted guilty verdicts and longer sentencing recommendations, and main effects were detected for mental health testimony and political orientation, although interactions were noted.
...

Studying Perceptions of Juror Influence In Vivo: A Social Relations Analysis

Perceptions of influence in the jury were mostly in the eye of the beholder, with jurors high in Conscientiousness and low in Openness being most likely to report that they were personally influenced by other jurors.

Verbal aggressiveness and communicator style characteristics of summoned jurors as predictors of actual jury selection

Recent research suggests that communication traits play a significant role in the jury selection process. To extend this line of research, 774 jurors in actual cases completed measures of verbal

Principled Moral Reasoning and Self-Monitoring as Predictors of Jury Functioning

Seventy-eight undergraduate students who had been administered the Defining issues Test (DIT) and the Self-Monitoring Scale (SMS) participated as jurors in mock trials. Consistent with expectation,

Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups.

This article provides a comprehensive review of the empirical research on jury decision making published between 1955 and 1999. In total, 206 distinguishable studies involving deliberating juries

Another look at social psychological aspects of juror bias

Two trials were constructed by tape recording verbatim reports taken in court. One was a case of theft, the other of rape, involving two defendants and varying the amount of incriminating evidence.

Jury selection in insanity defense cases

A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability.

Despite scholarly criticism, juror attitudes or individual differences might affect verdict choice in criminal trials. Authoritarianism is a face valid predictor. Twenty studies exploring the

On the Effectiveness of Voir Dire in Criminal Cases with Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity: An Empirical Study

Voir dire serves several purposes in criminal trials. Judges and attorneys explain important points of law to jurors, often by questioning prospective jurors on their knowledge of and willingness to

Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.

In 2 experiments, college students read a murder-trial transcript that included or did not include court-appointed expert testimony about eyewitness memory that decreased perceptions of guilt and eyewitness believability when it followed the evidence and preceded the judge's reminder.

Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.

Studies on factors that may influence jurors' verdicts are reviewed. These factors include characteristics of the jurors, characteristics of the victim and defendant, judges' instructions regarding
...