Five Cautions for the Copenhagen Interpretation's Critics

@article{Hanson1959FiveCF,
  title={Five Cautions for the Copenhagen Interpretation's Critics},
  author={Norwood Russell Hanson},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={1959},
  volume={26},
  pages={325 - 337}
}
  • N. R. Hanson
  • Published 1 October 1959
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophy of Science
Within the past decade there has grown an acute and highly articulate group of critics of the orthodox interpretation of quantum theory,--the so-called "Copenhagen Interpretation." The writings of people like Bopp, Janossy, and particularly Bohm and Feyerabend, must be taken very seriously indeed. The future of some important discussions in the philosophy and the logic of science rests with these individuals. But they have, in their own writings, occasionally matched the inelegancies of Bohr… 
Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation
According to the standard view, the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics originated in discussions between Bohr and Heisenberg in 1927, and was defended by Bohr in his classic
Pluralism and anarchism in quantum physics: Paul Feyerabend's writings on quantum physics in relation to his general philosophy of science.
  • Marij van Strien
  • Philosophy, Medicine
    Studies in history and philosophy of science
  • 2020
TLDR
It is argued that Feyerabend's arguments for theoretical pluralism and for challenging established theories were connected to his objections to the dogmatism and conservatism he observed in quantum physics.
A Pluralism Worth Having: Feyerabend's Well-Ordered Science
The goal of this dissertation is to reconstruct, critically evaluate, and apply the pluralism of Paul Feyerabend. I conclude by suggesting future points of contact between Feyerabend’s pluralism and
Mario Bunge on Causality
The physics of the past half-century has thoroughly discredited the simple atomistic view that an ultimate explanation of all natural processes may be found in a mechanism of cause-and-effect
Whittaker’s “postulates of impotence” and theory in psychology
SummaryIn understanding the place of theory in psychology, it is strategically important for psychologists to accept or reject two “postulates of impotence” (Whittaker). The postulate of conceptual
Complementarity in quantum mechanics: A logical analysis
The purpose of this paper is to give a precise explication of the concept of complementarity in Quantum Mechanics (QM, for short) as introduced and brought to prominence by Niels BohrA Einstein once
What Does a Proof Do if it Does Not Prove
One of the more interesting problems to arise from the Kuhnian (1) analysis of science is the problem of communication between scientists with differing cognitive commitments. By conceiving of
The revolt against rationalism: Feyerabend's critical philosophy.
  • Jamie Shaw
  • Medicine, Philosophy
    Studies in history and philosophy of science
  • 2020