Finiteness classes arising from Ramsey-theoretic statements in set theory without choice

@article{Brot2019FinitenessCA,
  title={Finiteness classes arising from Ramsey-theoretic statements in set theory without choice},
  author={Joshua Brot and Mengyang Cao and David J. Fern{\'a}ndez-Bret{\'o}n},
  journal={Ann. Pure Appl. Log.},
  year={2019},
  volume={172},
  pages={102961}
}

Figures from this paper

Hindman's Theorem in the hierarchy of Choice Principles

In the context of ZF, we analyze a version of Hindman’s finite unions theorem on infinite sets, which normally requires the Axiom of Choice to be proved. We establish the implication relations

Hindman’s theorem and choice

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 40 REFERENCES

The independence of Ramsey's theorem

In [3] F. P. Ramsey proved as a theorem of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZF) with the Axiom of Choice (AC) the following result: Let A be an infinite class and there exists an infinite subclass of A all of whose size n subsets are contained in only one of X or Y.

Strongly Amorphous Sets and Dual Dedekind Infinity

1. If A is strongly amorphous (i.e., all relations on A are definable), then its power set P(A) is dually Dedekind infinite, i. e., every function from P(A) onto P(A) is injective. 2. The class of

A Note on Hindman-Type Theorems for Uncountable Cardinals

It is shown how a family of natural Hindman-type theorems for uncountable cardinals can be obtained by adapting some recent results of the author from their original countable setting.

Finite Sums from Sequences Within Cells of a Partition of N

Ramsey's theorem in the hierarchy of choice principles

  • A. Blass
  • Mathematics, Economics
    Journal of Symbolic Logic
  • 1977
This paper proves or refute the provability of each of the possible implications between Ramsey's theorem and the weak axioms of choice mentioned in Appendix A.3 of Jech's book.

Open Problems in Partition Regularity

The aim in this paper is to present some of the natural and appealing open problems in the area of partition regularity in the infinite case.

On a Certain Notion of Finite and a Finiteness Class in Set Theory without Choice

The classical definition of a finite set is that a set X is finite if there exists a bijection f : X → n where n is a natural number (n = {m ∈ ω : m < n}, where as usual ω denotes the set of all

The Finite and the Infinite

The shrinking principle for families (Xi)i ∈ I of sets, indexed by a Dedekind-finite set I (i.e., there exists a family (Yi) i’i’s’I of pairwise disjoint subsets Yi of Xi with $\underset{i\in I}{\bigcup} Y_i = \underset {i\ in I} X_i$).

Some Aspects and Examples of Infinity Notions

  • J. Degen
  • Philosophy, Mathematics
    Math. Log. Q.
  • 1994
A formal definition of what could be called a T-notion of infinity, for set theories T extending ZF, is presented, around which some old and new notions of infinity are organized.

Choiceless Ramsey Theory of Linear Orders

A series of negative partition relations with finite exponents for the linear orders 〈α2,<lex〉, where α is an infinite ordinal and <lex is the lexicographical order are proved.