# Finite Dimensional Convexity and Optimization

@inproceedings{Florenzano2001FiniteDC,
title={Finite Dimensional Convexity and Optimization},
author={Monique Florenzano and Cuong Le Van and Pascal Gourdel},
year={2001}
}
• Published 20 April 2001
• Mathematics
Convexity in Rn.- Separation and Polarity.- Extremal Structure of Convex Sets.- Linear Programming.- Convex Functions.- Differential Theory of Convex Functions.- Convex Optimization With Convex Constraints.- Non Convex Optimization.- Appendix.
• Computer Science
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
• 2006
A comprehensive introduction to the subject of convex optimization shows in detail how such problems can be solved numerically with great efficiency.
• Mathematics
• 2016
Abstract In the spirit of Michael’s selection theorem [6, Theorem 3.1”’], we consider a nonempty convex-valued lower semicontinuous correspondence φ : X → 2 Y {\varphi:X\to 2^{Y}} . We prove that if
In this paper, the class of differentiable semi-infinite multiobjective programming problems with vanishing constraints is considered. Both Karush–Kuhn–Tucker necessary optimality conditions and,
• Mathematics
• 2018
In this paper basic results on sensitivity and stability analysis in differentiable nonlinear programming problems are surveyed. We follow mainly the approach of A. V. Fiacco and his co-authors. We
• Mathematics
• 2017
A cone theoretic Krein-Milman theorem states that in any locally convex T0 topological cone, every convex compact saturated subset is the compact saturated convex hull of its m-extreme points. In
We propose two different notations for cones generated by a set and for convex cones generated by a set, usually denoted by a same notation. We make some remarks on the Bouligand tangent cone and on
Abstract.For a pair of convex bodies K1 and K2 in Euclidean space $$\mathbb{E}^n$$, n ≥ 3, possibly unbounded, we show that K1 is a translate of K2 if either of the following conditions holds: (i)
• Mathematics
Communications in Contemporary Mathematics
• 2022
. Consider the equation of the linear oscillator u ′′ + u = h ( θ ), where the forcing term h : R → R is 2 π -periodic and positive. We show that the existence of a periodic solution implies the