• DOI:10.1017/s193029750000334x
• Corpus ID: 181675875

Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit

@article{Walker2019FindingMI,
  title={Finding meaning in the clouds: Illusory pattern perception predicts receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit},
  author={Alexander Cameron Walker and Martin Harry Turpin and Jennifer A. Stolz and Jonathan A. Fugelsang and Derek J. Koehler},
  journal={Judgment and Decision Making},
  year={2019},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:181675875}
}

• A. C. Walker, M. Turpin, +2 authors Derek J. Koehler
• Published in Judgment and Decision Making 1 March 2019
• Psychology

Previous research has demonstrated a link between illusory pattern perception and various irrational beliefs. On this basis, we hypothesized that participants who displayed greater degrees of illusory pattern perception would also be more likely to rate pseudo-profound bullshit statements as profound. We find support for this prediction across three experiments (N = 627) and four distinct measures of pattern perception. We further demonstrate that this observed relation is restricted to… 

Previous research has demonstrated a link between illusory pattern perception and various irrational beliefs. On this basis, we hypothesized that participants who displayed greater degrees of illusory pattern perception would also be more likely to rate pseudo-profound bullshit statements as profound. We find support for this prediction across three experiments (N = 627) and four distinct measures of pattern perception. We further demonstrate that this observed relation is restricted to illusory pattern perception, with participants displaying greater endorsement of non-illusory patterns being no more likely to rate pseudo-profound bullshit statements as profound. Additionally, this relation is not a product of a general proclivity to rate all statements as profound and is not accounted for by individual differences in analytic thinking. Overall, we demonstrate that individuals with a tendency to go beyond the available data such that they uncritically endorse patterns where no patterns exist are also more likely to create and endorse false-meaning in meaningless pseudo-profound statements. These findings are discussed in the context of a proposed framework that views individuals’ receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit as, in part, an unfortunate consequence of an otherwise adaptive process: that of pattern perception.