Feeling Conflicted and Seeking Information

@article{Sawicki2013FeelingCA,
  title={Feeling Conflicted and Seeking Information},
  author={Vanessa Sawicki and Duane T. Wegener and Jason K. Clark and Leandre R. Fabrigar and Steven M. Smith and Geoffrey R O Durso},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2013},
  volume={39},
  pages={735 - 747}
}
To date, little research has examined the impact of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude-congruent selective exposure. Past research would suggest that strong/univalent rather than weak/ambivalent attitudes should be more predictive of proattitudinal information seeking. Although ambivalent attitude structure might weaken the attitude’s effect on seeking proattitudinal information, we believe that conflicted attitudes might also motivate attitude-congruent selective exposure because… 

Figures from this paper

Perceived Responsiveness Increases Tolerance of Attitude Ambivalence and Enhances Intentions to Behave in an Open-Minded Manner
TLDR
Perceived responsiveness reduces the perception that one’s initial attitude is correct and valid, indicating that attitude structure and behavior intentions can be changed by an interpersonal variable, unrelated to the attitude itself.
Perceived Knowledge Moderates the Relation Between Subjective Ambivalence and the “Impact” of Attitudes: An Attitude Strength Perspective
TLDR
Perceived knowledge can moderate the relation between ambivalence and the impact of attitudes on related thinking, judging, and behaving and highlights the importance of understanding the combined impact of attitude strength antecedents.
Ambivalence and Interpersonal Liking: The Expression of Ambivalence as Social Validation of Attitudinal Conflict
TLDR
The findings suggest that the expression of ambivalence can have important interpersonal functions, as it might lead to an enhanced social image when interacting with those coping with attitudinal conflict.
Bridging the Partisan Divide? Exploring Ambivalence and Information Seeking Over Time in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election
Research has shown that holding conflicted attitudes (ambivalence) about political decisions may lead people to act as ideal citizens. One example of this normatively ideal behavior is seen in
The Social Utility of Ambivalence: Being Ambivalent on Controversial Issues Is Recognized as Competence
TLDR
Attitudinal ambivalence can be positively valued, as it is perceived as competence when the expression of criticism is socially accepted, and should be judged higher on social utility but not on social desirability, compared to clear-cut attitudes.
Metacognitive Reflection as a Moderator of Attitude Strength Versus Attitude Bolstering: Implications for Attitude Similarity and Attraction
TLDR
This work proposes metacognitive reflection as a moderator between traditional strength patterns and these emerging attitude bolstering patterns because of emerging research suggests that weak (uncertain) attitudes can substantially influence thinking or behavior.
Don't let the facts ruin a good story: The effect of vivid reviews on attitude ambivalence and its coping mechanisms
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES
Seeking Confirmation in Times of Doubt
Strong attitudes exert greater influence on social perceptions, judgments, and behaviors. Some research indicates that strong attitudes are associated with exposure to attitude-confirming
Beyond attitudinal ambivalence: effects of belief homogeneity on attitude-intention-behaviour relations
Attitudinal ambivalence extends the traditional unidimensional conceptualization of attitude by acknowledging that people can simultaneously evaluate attitude objects as positive and negative. The
Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses
This article reports two studies designed to test the hypotheses that lower levels of attitudinal ambivalence are associated with attitudes that are more predictive of behavior, more stable over
Attitudinal Ambivalence and Message-Based Persuasion: Motivated Processing of Proattitudinal Information and Avoidance of Counterattitudinal Information
TLDR
It is suggested that ambivalence can also create the opposite effect: avoidance of thinking about persuasive messages, which should lead people to avoid processing of counterattitudinal (disagreeable) information that threatens to increase ambivalentence.
The Agony of Ambivalence and Ways to Resolve It: Introducing the MAID Model
TLDR
This review integrates literature on attitudinal ambivalence with theories on decision making and coping strategies to gain a better understanding of when and how people deal with feelings of ambivalentence.
Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.
TLDR
A meta-analysis assessed whether exposure to information is guided by defense or accuracy motives, and found an uncongeniality bias emerged when uncongsenial information was relevant to accomplishing a current goal.
The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information
Ambivalence and Persuasion: The Processing of Messages about Immigrant Groups
  • Maio, Bell, Esses
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental social psychology
  • 1996
TLDR
It is predicted that the strong message would cause ambivalent participants to be more favorable toward residents of Hong Kong and toward their immigration from Hong Kong than would the weak message; this tendency was expected to be weaker among nonambivalent participants.
Working Knowledge, Cognitive Processing, and Attitudes: On the Determinants of Bias
This experiment demonstrated that attitude-relevant knowledge can enable biased or objective systematic processing of new information. Subjects having a high or low knowledge on AIDS risk prevention
...
...