Feeding Response of Ips paraconfusus to Phloem and Phloem Metabolites of Heterobasidion annosum–Inoculated Ponderosa Pine, Pinus ponderosa

Abstract

In studies of feeding by the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus, two pine stilbenes (pinosylvin and pinosylvin methyl ether), ferulic acid glucoside, and enantiomers of the four most common sugars present in ponderosa pine phloem (sucrose, glucose, fructose, and raffinose) did not stimulate or reduce male feeding when assayed on wet α-cellulose with or without stimulatory phloem extractives present. When allowed to feed on wet α-cellulose containing sequential extracts (hexane, methanol, and water) of ponderosa pine phloem, methanol and water extractives stimulated feeding, but hexane extractives did not. Males confined in wet α-cellulose containing aqueous or organic extracts of culture broths derived from phloem tissue and containing the root pathogen, Heterobasidion annosum, ingested less substrate than beetles confined to control preparations. In an assay using logs from uninoculated ponderosa pines, the mean lengths of phloem in the digestive tracts increased as time spent feeding increased. Males confined to the phloem of basal logs cut from ponderosa pines artificially inoculated with H. annosum ingested significantly less phloem than beetles in logs cut from trees that were (combined) mock-inoculated or uninoculated and did not contain the pathogen. However, individual pathogen-containing treatments were not significantly different from uninoculated controls. It was concluded that altered feeding rates are not a major factor which may explain why diseased ponderosa pines are colonized by I. paraconfusus.

DOI: 10.1023/A:1023885724220

6 Figures and Tables

Cite this paper

@article{McNee2003FeedingRO, title={Feeding Response of Ips paraconfusus to Phloem and Phloem Metabolites of Heterobasidion annosum–Inoculated Ponderosa Pine, Pinus ponderosa}, author={William R. McNee and Pierluigi Bonello and Andrew J. Storer and D. L. Wood and Thomas R. Gordon}, journal={Journal of Chemical Ecology}, year={2003}, volume={29}, pages={1183-1202} }