False Dilemma: A Systematic Exposition

  title={False Dilemma: A Systematic Exposition},
  author={Taeda Tomic},
  • T. Tomic
  • Published 21 January 2013
  • Philosophy
  • Argumentation
False dilemma is a specific form of reasoning: despite the fact that it is based on a deductively valid argument form, it is rightly depicted as fallacy. A systematic exposition of false dilemma is missing in theoretical approaches to fallacies. This article formulates six criteria for a well-grounded exposition of a fallacy, suggesting also a systematic exposition of false dilemma. These criteria can be used to both explain, and categorise, the various false dilemma fallacies. The article… 

Give the Standard Treatment of Fallacies a Chance! Cognitive and Rhetorical Insights into Fallacy Processing

While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12) when it comes to assessing the normative dimension of argumentation, we suggest that its

The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life

Philosophers of science have given up on the quest for a silver bullet to put an end to all pseudoscience, as such a neat formal criterion to separate good science from its contenders has proven

A Defense of Analogy Inference

Accounts of analogical inference are usually categorized into four broad groups: abductive, deductive, inductive and sui generis. The purpose of this paper is to defend a sui generis model of

The Cumulative Force of Analogies

In this paper I will argue that most objections to deductive analyses of a priori analogies are incorrect, often involve basic misinterpretations of what the deductive reconstruction of those

Argumentation and fallacies in creationist writings against evolutionary theory

BackgroundThe creationist–evolutionist conflict is perhaps the most significant example of a debate about a well-supported scientific theory not readily accepted by the public.MethodsWe analyzed

The Social False Dilemma: Perpetuating Conflicts between Liberals and Conservatives

This essay addresses the establishment of a social false dilemma in the form of the socially-constructed categories of liberals and conservatives. The illogical positioning of only two options for

Informal Logic The Distinction Between False Dilemma and False Disjunctive Syllogism

: Since a clear account of the fallacy of false disjunctive syllogism is missing in the literature, the fallacy is defined and its three types are differentiated after some preliminaries. Section 4

Analogical Argument Schemes and Complex Argumentation

This paper addresses several issues in argumentation theory. The over-arching goal is to discuss how a theory of analogical argument schemes fits the pragma- dialectical theory of argument schemes

Argumentative Polylogues: Beyond Dialectical Understanding of Fallacies

Abstract Dialectical fallacies are typically defined as breaches of the rules of a regulated discussion between two participants (di-logue). What if discussions become more complex and involve

Argumentation by analogy: A systematic analytical study of an argument scheme

This dissertation is a systematic analytical study of the argument scheme of argumentation by analogy. The dissertation adopts the framework of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation and



The Cogent Reasoning Model of Informal Fallacies

An infonnal fallacy is a reasoning error with three features: the reasoning employs an implicit cogent pattern; the fallacy results from one or more false premises; there is culpable ignorance or

Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide

Preface Introduction and preview 1. Why should we become critical thinkers? Beginning to think critically : Recognising arguments Identifying conclusions and premises Intermediate conclusions

A practical study of argument

1. What Is an Argument? (And What Is Not?). 2. Pinning Down Argument Structure. 3. Looking at Language. 4. When Is an Argument a Good One? 5. Premises: What to Accept and Why. 6. Working on

Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective

Contents: Part I:Argumentation and Communication. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Standpoints and Differences of Opinion. Argumentation as a Complex Speech Act. Speech Acts in a Critical Discussion.

Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority

Reliance on authority has always been a common recourse in argumentation, perhaps never more so than today in our highly technological society when knowledge has become so specialized—as manifested,

Fallacies and Argument Appraisal

1. Introduction to the study of fallaciousness 2. Fallacies of diversion 3. Fallacies of structure 4. Problems with language 5. Ad Hominem arguments 6. Other 'Ad' arguments 7. The Ad Verecundiam and

Profiles of Dialogue

The notion of “profile of dialogue” is clarified to a certain extent, by giving examples, and how profiles can be useful for the study of argumentation is indicated.

The Art of Reasoning

The Third Edition has been meticulously updated and continues the successful pedagogical approach of the two previous editions, guiding students through the fundamental elements of formal deductive

Knowledge and defeasibility