Fallibilism and concessive knowledge attributions

@article{Stanley2005FallibilismAC,
  title={Fallibilism and concessive knowledge attributions},
  author={J. Stanley},
  journal={Analysis},
  year={2005},
  volume={65},
  pages={126-131}
}
In this paper Jason Stanley challenge the claim made by Lewis that the contextualist semantics for ‘know’ gives the best explanation for the oddity caused by the claim made by falibilism. Stanley explains the oddity of falibilism without embracing contextualism. Thus, he appeals to a knowledge account of assertion to conclude that the contextualist motivation presupposed by Lewis is not so compelling, since it is not necessary to appeal to semantics in order to explain the oddity of falibilism. 
On the Pragmatic Explanation of Concessive Knowledge Attributions
On Lewis's reading, fallibilism is the contradictory view that it is possible that S knows that p, even though S cannot eliminate some remote scenarios in which not-p. The pragmatic strategy is toExpand
Concessive knowledge-attributions: fallibilism and gradualism
TLDR
This paper defuses the challenge posed by concessive knowledge-attributions via a gradualist refinement of what Fantl and McGrath (2009) call weak epistemic fallibilism. Expand
No Way To WAM
  • 2020
Many epistemologists explain the empirically attested contextual variation in knowledge ascriptions by appeal to a kind of warranted assertability maneuver (WAM) that finds the locus of variabilityExpand
Fallibilism, Epistemic Possibility, and Concessive Knowledge Attributions
1. If knowing requires believing on the basis of evidence that entails what’s believed, we have hardly any knowledge at all. Hence the near-universal acceptance of fallibilism in epistemology: ifExpand
Confusion about concessive knowledge attributions
  • Dylan Dodd
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • 2008
TLDR
There is a lot of confusion about CKAs and their significance, which is tried to clear some of this confusion up, as well as show what their significance is with respect to the debate between fallibilist and infallibilists about knowledge. Expand
The pragmatics of pragmatic encroachment
TLDR
It is argued that the Reasoning Disposition account, together with Grice’s Maxims, gives us an attractive pragmatic account of the connection between knowledge ascriptions and practical circumstances. Expand
Understanding Fallible Warrant and Fallible Knowledge: Three Proposals
One of contemporary epistemology's more important conceptual challenges is that of understanding the nature of fallibility. Part of why this matters is that it would contribute to our understandingExpand
Some fallibilist knowledge: Questioning knowledge-attributions and open knowledge
We may usefully distinguish between one’s having fallible knowledge and having a fallibilist stance on some of one’s knowledge. A fallibilist stance could include a concessive knowledge-attributionExpand
Clarity about concessive knowledge attributions: reply to Dodd
TLDR
This paper responds to the criticisms Dodd offers of the account of the semantics and the sometime-infelicity of CKAs given, showing both how Dodd misunderstands certain central features of that view and how the latter can be naturally extended to explain the oddity of those “For all I know” statements. Expand
Simple Contextualism about Epistemic Modals Is Incorrect
I argue against a simple contextualist account of epistemic modals. My argument, like the argument on which it is based (von Fintel and Gillies 2011 and MacFarlane 2011), charges that simpleExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 10 REFERENCES
Assertion, Knowledge, and Context
The positions under discussion are both located in the area of overlap between epistemology and the philosophy of language, and they have both received a good deal of attention in recent years. ButExpand
The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions
othis view strikes many as implausible, 7 it does seem to square with the relevant data. Thus, e.g., in terms of the Bank Case, it’s DeRose’s contention that most of us will find both of theExpand
Perception, Knowledge and Belief: Selected Essays
Part I. Knowledge: 1. Conclusive reasons 2. Epistemic operators 3. The pragmatic dimension of knowledge 4. The epistemology of belief 5. Two conceptions of knowledge: rational vs. reliable beliefExpand
Commonplace Book: 1919-1953
A collection of notebooks which express the views of the English philosopher George Edward Moore. They deal with such subjects as the paradoxes of the Epimenides family, conditional and disjunctiveExpand
Knowledge and lotteries
1. Introducing the Puzzle 2. Contextualism and the Puzzle 3. Invariantist Treatments 4. Sensitive Moderate Invariantism Bibliography
The pragmatic dimension of knowledge
Elusive knowledge
  • Australasian Journal of Philosophy
  • 1996
Epistemic possibilities
  • Philosophical Review
  • 1991
Epistemic possibilities
  • Philosophical Review
  • 1991