Fairness in the climate negotiations: what explains variation in parties’ expressed conceptions?

@article{Trstad2018FairnessIT,
  title={Fairness in the climate negotiations: what explains variation in parties’ expressed conceptions?},
  author={V. T{\o}rstad and H{\aa}kon S{\ae}len},
  journal={Climate Policy},
  year={2018},
  volume={18},
  pages={642 - 654}
}
  • V. Tørstad, Håkon Sælen
  • Published 2018
  • Economics
  • Climate Policy
    • ABSTRACT How to differentiate efforts and obligations fairly between countries has been among the most central and controversial issues in climate negotiations. This article analyses countries’ fairness conceptions as expressed in position documents submitted during negotiations leading to the Paris Agreement. A regression analysis investigates which country characteristics predict relative support for three fundamental fairness principles – Responsibility, Capability and Rights (needs). The… CONTINUE READING
    View on Taylor & Francis
    cadmus.eui.eu
    14 Citations
    Background Citations
    3
    Methods Citations
    1
    14 Citations
    Citation Type

    Citation Type

    Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement : Is there a relationship?
    • 1
    Delegation size and equity in climate negotiations: An exploration of key issues
    • 1
    Convergence and Divergence of UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions
    • 1
    Negotiating weights for burden sharing rules in international climate negotiations: an empirical analysis
    • PDF
    Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Paris Agreement: An Integrative Approach
    Participation, ambition and compliance: can the Paris Agreement solve the effectiveness trilemma?
    • 3
    The risk of carbon leakage in global climate agreements
    • PDF
    Ratchet Up or Down? An Experimental Investigation of Global Public Good Provision in the United Nations Youth Associations Network
    • 2
    • PDF
    On self-interested preferences for burden sharing rules: An econometric analysis for the costs of energy policy measures
    • 7
    • PDF
    Warming assessment of the bottom-up Paris Agreement emissions pledges
    • 36
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 79 REFERENCES
    Negotiating Weights for Burden Sharing Rules Among Heterogeneous Parties: Empirical Evidence from a Survey Among Delegates in International Climate Negotiations
    • 12
    • PDF
    Determinants of bargaining success in the climate change negotiations
    • 50
    • PDF
    Distributive fairness: A mutual recognition approach
    • 26
    Strategy in the climate change negotiations: do democracies negotiate differently?
    • 26
    Equity and Justice in Global Warming Policy
    • 55
    • PDF
    Constructed Peer Groups and Path Dependence in International Organizations: The Case of the International Climate Change Negotiations
    • 22
    • PDF
    Burden Sharing and Fairness Principles in International Climate Policy
    • 292
    • PDF
    States’ interests at international climate negotiations: new measures of bargaining positions
    • 14
    • PDF
    The UNFCCC as a negotiation forum: towards common but more differentiated responsibilities
    • 53
    On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations
    • 128
    • PDF