Fairness and Cheating

@inproceedings{Houser2010FairnessAC,
  title={Fairness and Cheating},
  author={Daniel Houser and Stefan Vetter and Joachim Winter},
  year={2010}
}
We present evidence from a laboratory experiment showing that individuals who believe they were treated unfairly in an interaction with another person are more likely to cheat in a subsequent unrelated game. Specifically, subjects first participated in a dictator game. They then flipped a coin in private and reported the outcome. Subjects could increase their total payoff by cheating, i.e., lying about the outcome of the coin toss. We found that subjects were more likely to cheat in reporting… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 71 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
31 Citations
16 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 31 extracted citations

71 Citations

01020'12'14'16'18
Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 71 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 16 references

Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction

  • C. Camerer
  • 2003
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation.

  • E. Fehr, G. Kirchsteiger, A. Riedl
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
  • 1993
Highly Influential
6 Excerpts

Luck or Cheating? A Field Experiment on Honesty with Children.

  • A. Bucciol, M. Piovesan
  • 2009
2 Excerpts

The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance.

  • N. Mazar, O. Amir, D. Ariely
  • Journal of Marketing Research,
  • 2008
2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…